linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Haitao Shi <shihaitao1@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangle6@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix some spelling mistakes in comments
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:06:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201127080605.GA557259@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201127011747.86005-1-shihaitao1@huawei.com>

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 09:17:47AM +0800, Haitao Shi wrote:
> Fix some spelling mistakes in comments:
> 	udpate ==> update
> 	succesful ==> successful
> 	exmaple ==> example
> 	unneccessary ==> unnecessary
> 	stoping ==> stopping
> 	uknown ==> unknown
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haitao Shi <shihaitao1@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  mm/filemap.c     | 2 +-
>  mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
>  mm/khugepaged.c  | 2 +-
>  mm/memblock.c    | 2 +-
>  mm/migrate.c     | 2 +-
>  mm/page_ext.c    | 2 +-
>  6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 3ebbe64..8826c48 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@ static int __wait_on_page_locked_async(struct page *page,
>  	else
>  		ret = PageLocked(page);
>  	/*
> -	 * If we were succesful now, we know we're still on the
> +	 * If we were successful now, we know we're still on the
>  	 * waitqueue as we're still under the lock. This means it's
>  	 * safe to remove and return success, we know the callback
>  	 * isn't going to trigger.
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index ec2bb93..0fea0c2 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2356,7 +2356,7 @@ static void __split_huge_page_tail(struct page *head, int tail,
>  	 * Clone page flags before unfreezing refcount.
>  	 *
>  	 * After successful get_page_unless_zero() might follow flags change,
> -	 * for exmaple lock_page() which set PG_waiters.
> +	 * for example lock_page() which set PG_waiters.
>  	 */
>  	page_tail->flags &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
>  	page_tail->flags |= (head->flags &
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 4e3dff1..d6f7ede 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  			 * PTEs are armed with uffd write protection.
>  			 * Here we can also mark the new huge pmd as
>  			 * write protected if any of the small ones is
> -			 * marked but that could bring uknown
> +			 * marked but that could bring unknown
>  			 * userfault messages that falls outside of
>  			 * the registered range.  So, just be simple.
>  			 */
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index b68ee86..086662a 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>   * @base: base address of the region
>   * @size: size of the region
>   * @set: set or clear the flag
> - * @flag: the flag to udpate
> + * @flag: the flag to update
>   *
>   * This function isolates region [@base, @base + @size), and sets/clears flag
>   *
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 5795cb8..8a3580c 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -2548,7 +2548,7 @@ static bool migrate_vma_check_page(struct page *page)
>  		 * will bump the page reference count. Sadly there is no way to
>  		 * differentiate a regular pin from migration wait. Hence to
>  		 * avoid 2 racing thread trying to migrate back to CPU to enter
> -		 * infinite loop (one stoping migration because the other is
> +		 * infinite loop (one stopping migration because the other is
>  		 * waiting on pte migration entry). We always return true here.
>  		 *
>  		 * FIXME proper solution is to rework migration_entry_wait() so
> diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> index a3616f7..cf931eb 100644
> --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>   *
>   * The need callback is used to decide whether extended memory allocation is
>   * needed or not. Sometimes users want to deactivate some features in this
> - * boot and extra memory would be unneccessary. In this case, to avoid
> + * boot and extra memory would be unnecessary. In this case, to avoid
>   * allocating huge chunk of memory, each clients represent their need of
>   * extra memory through the need callback. If one of the need callbacks
>   * returns true, it means that someone needs extra memory so that
> -- 
> 2.10.1
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-27  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-27  1:17 [PATCH] mm: fix some spelling mistakes in comments Haitao Shi
2020-11-27  8:06 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2020-11-27 19:29 ` Souptick Joarder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201127080605.GA557259@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shihaitao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangle6@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).