From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Liu Zixian <liuzixian4@huawei.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
louhongxiang@huawei.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
hushiyuan@huawei.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fix mmap return value when vma is merged after call_mmap()
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:25:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201204152535.GP11935@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201204151028.GZ5487@ziepe.ca>
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:10:28AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:11:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 03.12.20 09:53, Liu Zixian wrote:
> > > On success, mmap should return the begin address of newly mapped area,
> > > but patch "mm: mmap: merge vma after call_mmap() if possible"
> > > set vm_start of newly merged vma to return value addr.
> > > Users of mmap will get wrong address if vma is merged after call_mmap().
> > > We fix this by moving the assignment to addr before merging vma.
> > >
> > > Fixes: d70cec898324 ("mm: mmap: merge vma after call_mmap() if possible")
> > > Signed-off-by: Liu Zixian <liuzixian4@huawei.com>
> > > v2:
> > > We want to do "addr = vma->vm_start;" unconditionally,
> > > so move assignment to addr before if(unlikely) block.
> > > mm/mmap.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > > index d91ecb00d38c..5c8b4485860d 100644
> > > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > > @@ -1808,6 +1808,17 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> > > if (error)
> > > goto unmap_and_free_vma;
> > >
> > > + /* Can addr have changed??
> > > + *
> > > + * Answer: Yes, several device drivers can do it in their
> > > + * f_op->mmap method. -DaveM
> > > + * Bug: If addr is changed, prev, rb_link, rb_parent should
> > > + * be updated for vma_link()
> > > + */
> >
> >
> > Why do we tolerate device drivers doing such stuff at all?
> > WARN_ON_ONCE() is just as good as BUG_ON() in many environments. If we
> > support it, then no warning. If we don't support it, then why tolerate it?
>
> The commit that introduced this seemed pretty clear it is to catch
> possibly wrong drivers. I suppose the idea was to give a migration
> time where things would "work" and drivers could be fixed. Since it
> has now been 8 years it should be either dropped or turned into:
>
> /* Drivers are not permitted to change vm_start */
> if (WARN_ON(addr != vma->vm_start)) {
> err = EINVAL
> goto unmap_and_free_vma
> }
This commit makes no sense. I know it's eight years old, so maybe the
device driver which did this has long been removed from the tree, but
davem's comment was (iirc) related to a device driver for a graphics
card that would 256MB-align the user address. Another possibility is
that userspace always asks for a 256MB-aligned address these days.
I don't understand why prev/rb_link/rb_parent would need to be changed
in this case. It's going to be inserted at the exact same location in
the rbtree, just at a slightly shifted address.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-04 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-03 8:53 [PATCH v2] fix mmap return value when vma is merged after call_mmap() Liu Zixian
2020-12-03 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-04 2:29 ` Liu Zixian
2020-12-04 14:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-12-04 15:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 15:25 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-12-04 16:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-04 19:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-12-04 15:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201204152535.GP11935@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hushiyuan@huawei.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuzixian4@huawei.com \
--cc=louhongxiang@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).