From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: do not assume PTE is writable after follow_pfn
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 05:32:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210205103259.42866-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
This series is the first step towards fixing KVM's usage of follow_pfn.
The immediate fix here is that KVM is not checking the writability of
the PFN, which actually dates back to way before the introduction of
follow_pfn in commit add6a0cd1c5b ("KVM: MMU: try to fix up page faults
before giving up", 2016-07-05). There are more changes needed to
invalidate gfn-to-pfn caches from MMU notifiers, but this issue will
be tackled later.
A more fundamental issue however is that the follow_pfn function is
basically impossible to use correctly. Almost all users for example
are assuming that the page is writable; KVM was not alone in this
mistake. follow_pte, despite not being exported for modules, is a
far saner API. Therefore, patch 1 simplifies follow_pte a bit and
makes it available to modules.
Please review and possibly ack for inclusion in the KVM tree,
thanks!
Paolo
Paolo Bonzini (2):
mm: provide a sane PTE walking API for modules
KVM: do not assume PTE is writable after follow_pfn
arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c | 2 +-
fs/dax.c | 5 +++--
include/linux/mm.h | 6 ++++--
mm/memory.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.26.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 10:32 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-02-05 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: provide a sane PTE walking API for modules Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-05 13:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-08 17:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-08 18:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-09 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 9:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-05 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: do not assume PTE is writable after follow_pfn Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-05 15:43 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05 17:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05 18:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Peter Xu
2021-02-08 18:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-08 22:02 ` Peter Xu
2021-02-08 23:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-09 0:23 ` Peter Xu
2021-02-09 8:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 10:02 ` Joao Martins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210205103259.42866-1-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).