linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Zhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	hughd@google.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	npiggin@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	guohanjun@huawei.com, dingtianhong@huawei.com,
	chenweilong@huawei.com, rui.xiang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memcg: set memcg when split page
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:02:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210308210225.GF3479805@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304074053.65527-3-zhouguanghui1@huawei.com>

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:40:53AM +0000, Zhou Guanghui wrote:
> As described in the split_page function comment, for the non-compound
> high order page, the sub-pages must be freed individually. If the
> memcg of the fisrt page is valid, the tail pages cannot be uncharged
> when be freed.
> 
> For example, when alloc_pages_exact is used to allocate 1MB continuous
> physical memory, 2MB is charged(kmemcg is enabled and __GFP_ACCOUNT is
> set). When make_alloc_exact free the unused 1MB and free_pages_exact
> free the applied 1MB, actually, only 4KB(one page) is uncharged.
> 
> Therefore, the memcg of the tail page needs to be set when split page.

There's another place we need to do this to ...

+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5081,9 +5081,15 @@ void __free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
 {
        if (put_page_testzero(page))
                free_the_page(page, order);
-       else if (!PageHead(page))
-               while (order-- > 0)
-                       free_the_page(page + (1 << order), order);
+       else if (!PageHead(page)) {
+               while (order-- > 0) {
+                       struct page *tail = page + (1 << order);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+                       tail->memcg_data = page->memcg_data;
+#endif
+                       free_the_page(tail, order);
+               }
+       }
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__free_pages);
 

I wonder if we shouldn't initialise memcg_data on all subsequent pages
of non-compound allocations instead?  Because I'm not sure this is the
only place that needs to be fixed.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  7:40 [PATCH v2 0/2] set memcg when split page Zhou Guanghui
2021-03-04  7:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/memcg: rename mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup to split_page_memcg Zhou Guanghui
2021-03-04 15:50   ` Johannes Weiner
2021-03-04 16:20   ` Zi Yan
2021-03-04 18:54   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-03-08 22:37   ` Singh, Balbir
2021-03-09  8:28     ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 21:44       ` Singh, Balbir
2021-03-10 22:00         ` Hugh Dickins
2021-03-10 23:50           ` Singh, Balbir
2021-03-04  7:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memcg: set memcg when split page Zhou Guanghui
2021-03-04 15:52   ` Johannes Weiner
2021-03-04 16:22   ` Zi Yan
2021-03-04 18:55   ` Shakeel Butt
     [not found]   ` <YEIblNv0BMITFzYO@dhcp22.suse.cz>
2021-03-05 23:58     ` Andrew Morton
2021-03-08  8:41       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-08 20:42         ` Andrew Morton
2021-03-08 20:47           ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-09  0:10             ` Andrew Morton
2021-03-08 21:02   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-03-09  9:02     ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-09 12:32       ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-09 13:03         ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-11  8:37           ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-11 15:21             ` Johannes Weiner
2021-03-11 16:23               ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-11 16:26               ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-11 20:37                 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-03-18 14:05                   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-18 15:02                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-18 15:07                     ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210308210225.GF3479805@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chenweilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=rui.xiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhouguanghui1@huawei.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).