From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5443C433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B6064FF4 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:27:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 32B6064FF4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 908138D0171; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:27:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8DFB28D0148; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:27:11 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 782578D0171; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:27:11 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0133.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.133]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A74A8D0148 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:27:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A12815B for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:27:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77902982262.09.7C1E5BC Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C583C0001EE for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:27:10 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: flKEPWDMCkkx9fLcP593LBgFyo4hp17KtLaMys4nUFzjOJnKc0MDcgr8jlHB5pcbKJSM/JPX3w fs1S9X3J3TXA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9917"; a="186018178" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,236,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="186018178" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2021 22:27:08 -0800 IronPort-SDR: ouIk1BF3tljdFg26L8+Q8KzPvjVS59e7xljVT76S14nRcxKoMzZcOqk2MUUWhcQ9iLV6dXnZhs 5B33vpfXXavA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,236,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="438199033" Received: from shbuild999.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.147.94]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2021 22:27:04 -0800 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:27:04 +0800 From: Feng Tang To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko , Andrea Arcangeli , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , Mike Kravetz , Randy Dunlap , Vlastimil Babka , Dave Hansen , Ben Widawsky , Andi leen , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] mm/mempolicy: Add comment for missing LOCAL Message-ID: <20210310062704.GA63076@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> References: <1614766858-90344-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> <1614766858-90344-2-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1614766858-90344-2-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4C583C0001EE X-Stat-Signature: zp3tkd4yx1y7fyo3yit9t6itf3gnh8cb Received-SPF: none (intel.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf06; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mga04.intel.com; client-ip=192.55.52.120 X-HE-DKIM-Result: none/none X-HE-Tag: 1615357630-79588 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:20:45PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote: > From: Ben Widawsky > > MPOL_LOCAL is a bit weird because it is simply a different name for an > existing behavior (preferred policy with no node mask). It has been this > way since it was added here: > commit 479e2802d09f ("mm: mempolicy: Make MPOL_LOCAL a real policy") > > It is so similar to MPOL_PREFERRED in fact that when the policy is > created in mpol_new, the mode is set as PREFERRED, and an internal state > representing LOCAL doesn't exist. > > To prevent future explorers from scratching their head as to why > MPOL_LOCAL isn't defined in the mpol_ops table, add a small comment > explaining the situations. > > v2: > Change comment to refer to mpol_new (Michal) > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630212517.308045-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com > #Acked-by: Michal Hocko This shouldn't be masked: Acked-by: Michal Hocko I did the mask when sending for internal review, and forgot to restore it, sorry for the noise. Thanks, Feng > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang > --- > mm/mempolicy.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c > index 2c3a865..5730fc1 100644 > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations mpol_ops[MPOL_MAX] = { > .create = mpol_new_bind, > .rebind = mpol_rebind_nodemask, > }, > + /* [MPOL_LOCAL] - see mpol_new() */ > }; > > static int migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist, > -- > 2.7.4