From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page allocation for many preferred
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:19:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202103171506.QmuR9fOs-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1615952410-36895-12-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 14501 bytes --]
Hi Feng,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.12-rc3]
[cannot apply to next-20210316]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Feng-Tang/Introduced-multi-preference-mempolicy/20210317-114204
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git a74e6a014c9d4d4161061f770c9b4f98372ac778
config: s390-randconfig-r022-20210317 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8ef111222a3dd12a9175f69c3bff598c46e8bdf7)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/3bfe0c833846b79ae8bbfff60906c9d7c244c3b8
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Feng-Tang/Introduced-multi-preference-mempolicy/20210317-114204
git checkout 3bfe0c833846b79ae8bbfff60906c9d7c244c3b8
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
___constant_swab32(x) : \
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:19:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
(((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x000000ffUL) << 24) | \
^
In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
___constant_swab32(x) : \
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:20:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
(((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x0000ff00UL) << 8) | \
^
In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
___constant_swab32(x) : \
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:21:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
(((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff0000UL) >> 8) | \
^
In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
___constant_swab32(x) : \
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:22:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
(((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff000000UL) >> 24)))
^
In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:120:12: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
__fswab32(x))
^
In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/hugetlb.c:1129:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
~~~~ ^
include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
#define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
#define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
^~~~
>> mm/hugetlb.c:1129:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
~~~~ ^
include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
#define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:58:61: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
#define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
^~~~
>> mm/hugetlb.c:1129:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
~~~~ ^
include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
#define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:58:86: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
#define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:69:3: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_value'
(cond) ? \
^~~~
mm/hugetlb.c:1896:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
~~~~ ^
include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
#define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
#define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
^~~~
mm/hugetlb.c:1896:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
~~~~ ^
include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
#define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:58:61: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
#define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
^~~~
mm/hugetlb.c:1896:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
~~~~ ^
include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
#define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:58:86: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
#define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:69:3: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_value'
(cond) ? \
^~~~
20 warnings and 6 errors generated.
vim +1129 mm/hugetlb.c
1102
1103 static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
1104 struct vm_area_struct *vma,
1105 unsigned long address, int avoid_reserve,
1106 long chg)
1107 {
1108 struct page *page = NULL;
1109 struct mempolicy *mpol;
1110 gfp_t gfp_mask;
1111 nodemask_t *nodemask;
1112 int nid;
1113
1114 /*
1115 * A child process with MAP_PRIVATE mappings created by their parent
1116 * have no page reserves. This check ensures that reservations are
1117 * not "stolen". The child may still get SIGKILLed
1118 */
1119 if (!vma_has_reserves(vma, chg) &&
1120 h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
1121 goto err;
1122
1123 /* If reserves cannot be used, ensure enough pages are in the pool */
1124 if (avoid_reserve && h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
1125 goto err;
1126
1127 gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h);
1128 nid = huge_node(vma, address, gfp_mask, &mpol, &nodemask);
> 1129 if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
1130 gfp_t gfp_mask1 = gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN;
1131
1132 gfp_mask1 &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
1133 page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h,
1134 gfp_mask1, nid, nodemask);
1135 if (!page)
1136 page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL);
1137 } else {
1138 page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
1139 }
1140 if (page && !avoid_reserve && vma_has_reserves(vma, chg)) {
1141 SetHPageRestoreReserve(page);
1142 h->resv_huge_pages--;
1143 }
1144
1145 mpol_cond_put(mpol);
1146 return page;
1147
1148 err:
1149 return NULL;
1150 }
1151
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 14937 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 3:39 [PATCH v4 00/13] Introduced multi-preference mempolicy Feng Tang
2021-03-17 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] mm/mempolicy: Add comment for missing LOCAL Feng Tang
2021-03-17 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] mm/mempolicy: convert single preferred_node to full nodemask Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:17 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] mm/mempolicy: Add MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY for multiple preferred nodes Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-20 7:16 ` Feng Tang
2021-05-13 7:23 ` Feng Tang
2021-05-13 7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mempolicy: kill MPOL_F_LOCAL bit Feng Tang
2021-05-13 13:55 ` Andi Kleen
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] mm/mempolicy: allow preferred code to take a nodemask Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:55 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-19 8:49 ` Feng Tang
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] mm/mempolicy: refactor rebind code for PREFERRED_MANY Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:57 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] mm/mempolicy: kill v.preferred_nodes Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] mm/mempolicy: handle MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY like BIND Feng Tang
2021-04-14 13:01 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] mm/mempolicy: Create a page allocator for policy Feng Tang
2021-04-14 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-15 8:17 ` Feng Tang
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] mm/mempolicy: Thread allocation for many preferred Feng Tang
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] mm/mempolicy: VMA " Feng Tang
2021-04-14 13:14 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page " Feng Tang
2021-03-17 7:19 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-04-14 13:25 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-15 7:41 ` Feng Tang
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] mm/mempolicy: Advertise new MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY Feng Tang
2021-03-17 3:40 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] mem/mempolicy: unify mpol_new_preferred() and mpol_new_preferred_many() Feng Tang
2021-04-14 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Introduced multi-preference mempolicy Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202103171506.QmuR9fOs-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).