From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D837C433ED for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 01:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA9A61029 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 01:37:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0EA9A61029 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9F8F06B00B5; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:37:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9AA4E6B00B7; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:37:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 897BE6B00B8; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:37:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0139.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.139]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE0C6B00B5 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 21:37:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A547181AF5C2 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 01:37:56 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78105466152.21.0D25AEE Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0706000112 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 01:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA4D2610A1; Wed, 5 May 2021 01:37:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1620178675; bh=O1P92AmCrr/KAm7r5tlKKsf26kXlE6tfG1HXivuuGQs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=bBpnrM15j6qerTu000V+xhn8jaVERfQPS2pB1hGCMNsIa/1ODFL0DCzwefJu+FGsY bzG6DrYKpJbY1sLqBhuex9bPgHvy2JC3PEP0e9elRcuwnjX/UKZwKqRCZWHJcdTTld PnjFbech1JZ2eY+0GsAluN+mkljA0TenI6CKwCsg= Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 18:37:54 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, guro@fb.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz Subject: [patch 097/143] mm: no more EINVAL from /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh Message-ID: <20210505013754.Udec-NlXE%akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210504183219.a3cc46aee4013d77402276c5@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=bBpnrM15; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org X-Stat-Signature: 9akbyhb1wqxe6r4siohrfrx9i8ij88y6 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BB0706000112 Received-SPF: none (linux-foundation.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf09; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail.kernel.org; client-ip=198.145.29.99 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1620178666-400496 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Hugh Dickins Subject: mm: no more EINVAL from /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh EINVAL was good for drawing the refresher's attention to a warning in dmesg, but became very tiresome when running test suites scripted with "set -e": an underflow from a bug in one feature would cause unrelated tests much later to fail, just because their /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh touch failed with that error. Stop doing that. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.2102251510410.13363@eggly.anvils Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins Acked-by: Roman Gushchin Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/vmstat.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) --- a/mm/vmstat.c~mm-no-more-einval-from-proc-sys-vm-stat_refresh +++ a/mm/vmstat.c @@ -1862,7 +1862,6 @@ int vmstat_refresh(struct ctl_table *tab if (val < 0) { pr_warn("%s: %s %ld\n", __func__, zone_stat_name(i), val); - err = -EINVAL; } } #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA @@ -1871,7 +1870,6 @@ int vmstat_refresh(struct ctl_table *tab if (val < 0) { pr_warn("%s: %s %ld\n", __func__, numa_stat_name(i), val); - err = -EINVAL; } } #endif @@ -1880,11 +1878,8 @@ int vmstat_refresh(struct ctl_table *tab if (val < 0) { pr_warn("%s: %s %ld\n", __func__, node_stat_name(i), val); - err = -EINVAL; } } - if (err) - return err; if (write) *ppos += *lenp; else _