From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E237C433B4 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99F66112F for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:30:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A99F66112F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0D1C86B006C; Wed, 5 May 2021 22:30:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 082936B006E; Wed, 5 May 2021 22:30:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E63B26B0070; Wed, 5 May 2021 22:30:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0241.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.241]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDF66B006C for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 22:30:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin31.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C36D6D7B for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:30:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78109226244.31.06643E2 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07883C0 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:29:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=jLbvTtzsMHsiCpP+jmrHZgsjl8t2eDomB5Z8sBnaQ/w=; b=q+7qKE7dHFXk9r9iVAkdEOUK40 nBpcixf8QRyJmjugB3QBqIdRgssrbCwbnhDgZQSXvVIKjgLSoDgfh3fgyV/NqT3PK3lt7r94XS5M+ QyBln1ZPM7PJzugGDewgse55bwKI5oydKKvk1EGnAmGNM07eGsBqTWdB7vLDFZYc+ZFeXye22TSLN VH3paeaHC1DDPKy8kFu901U7izoVlWDPWsOuMtRo1T1R5E/hYp/HUnL521IZOy0rXftBUiIv8xn0R l4DUMQHat5UBrG7SOSGvwBvmx3uXYG/2Y4ReC3uQT9f/JPJJzBJIZ1jffLNkxClIahptVZP2akXr6 /9eg/oVw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1leTks-001C6I-1Q; Thu, 06 May 2021 02:29:25 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 03:28:46 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: kernel test robot Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 77/96] mm/filemap: Add filemap_alloc_folio Message-ID: <20210506022846.GL1847222@casper.infradead.org> References: <20210505150628.111735-78-willy@infradead.org> <202105060717.iCOhoRD0-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202105060717.iCOhoRD0-lkp@intel.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B07883C0 X-Stat-Signature: pgrab84cg3ha1a8obsgfzbzj3pgid7bc Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=q+7qKE7d; spf=none (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org; dmarc=none Received-SPF: none (infradead.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf04; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=casper.infradead.org; client-ip=90.155.50.34 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1620268196-213119 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 08:00:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >> mm/filemap.c:1000:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] gfp @@ got int [assigned] n @@ > mm/filemap.c:1000:52: sparse: expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] gfp > mm/filemap.c:1000:52: sparse: got int [assigned] n > >> mm/filemap.c:1000:55: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int order @@ got restricted gfp_t [usertype] gfp @@ > mm/filemap.c:1000:55: sparse: expected unsigned int order > mm/filemap.c:1000:55: sparse: got restricted gfp_t [usertype] gfp fixed