From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7CAC433ED for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE54A61628 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:43:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CE54A61628 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 31A066B006E; Tue, 11 May 2021 08:43:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2C8E76B0071; Tue, 11 May 2021 08:43:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 143446B0072; Tue, 11 May 2021 08:43:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0045.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.45]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99446B006E for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 08:43:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92774DD8 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:43:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78128915130.02.A4A943B Received: from mail-lj1-f174.google.com (mail-lj1-f174.google.com [209.85.208.174]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D8A3F2 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f174.google.com with SMTP id w4so24922168ljw.9 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:43:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/gumHvNEpc1nJPYB2ZuwIChFIQ8bIFdIers85eOwvkQ=; b=T4KJQj2WH+Er8/Ehrytm2qxTVOzlSNvDURXiOB6xEn+TFsvRlb85p1bGeLhAPF6vI2 zSThknurOtcuHK/8smbDBJSclZ2FOwvi2QmCJirGSFCgXKI4LqjCmcya8dW20uK4Sv0L SOn7ZgD3WfkEysYbn7rNz7LF4NKyR+LrPaIR6XaGoLCrbDx2PiFPRkLC9ZIJZy07QFSs 6DEmG1rH7B8iDpCmSL+/11Ck3nCeU+sfm0tdpn/KoxvAKbvVbxoslh+Y8cxOlayr+ie0 ugWZThQ/ARqXbti0pwqysne5TjLUvwRhgV+rfsa3/e+LrmXKZ870hqbnQyBJ79e7rUwJ V/DA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/gumHvNEpc1nJPYB2ZuwIChFIQ8bIFdIers85eOwvkQ=; b=OHmKBrOJmCtG+vwwMWA0JgvThgMqccL6CQDJbkoEl3mb7Y2N6LazM0igYe6kXQox8H dNjgcbvQ40203pUat/VAaQT7wBqYP6qsebt+GQQgjbyyRvXaCIRHNoOK81PeMcgo/UIJ 8JeLkMQK04xq3yo78Og6GXlQU5rIa2lCgVK2x4Alt3UH1sbxOkAxWFqKxRnWVkAT75ky FlFmNJs8ZvkVVJZV958tuuRlZhuJsvRLBTV1nz4VLqST1S+oBSrVBOpo4auFksp9FK3t Kt9l38XtDnTLeH6aJHR2HAFoqKsUkYO89QoHRHAyvwWNXxqc5x8KHOptAqw42/ditjOK SOjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530U8bSs8a66gJ8ljw+6i+fMZcVFyKO7neKYvMf8LbzmajCmFu52 wPERQF6zALsNoPA7VXYtxLQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwR9kobPCnS7ONfYw5OImQ3RMIaMNymPrVOMmTAV3mMZGZbIEinw0TGspacatyMq9Ubti/sUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:485:: with SMTP id s5mr24752636ljc.364.1620736983819; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc638.lan (h5ef52e3d.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k13sm2587742lfu.136.2021.05.11.05.43.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 May 2021 05:43:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:43:01 +0200 To: Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton Cc: Andrew Morton , Uladzislau Rezki , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Nicholas Piggin , Mel Gorman , Hillf Danton , Michal Hocko , Oleksiy Avramchenko , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/vmalloc: Print a warning message first on failure Message-ID: <20210511124301.GA1897@pc638.lan> References: <20210509193844.2562-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20210509193844.2562-2-urezki@gmail.com> <20210509200519.GA3016@pc638.lan> <20210509212641.GA3220@pc638.lan> <20210510103342.GA2169@pc638.lan> <20210510185238.787adc7378bc6d82262399d2@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Authentication-Results: imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=T4KJQj2W; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of urezki@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=urezki@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C6D8A3F2 X-Stat-Signature: hiopuynrkzrqmghq8cc7esb6haqygsdk Received-SPF: none (gmail.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf29; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail-lj1-f174.google.com; client-ip=209.85.208.174 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1620736978-971144 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:58:18AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:52:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 10 May 2021 12:33:42 +0200 Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > > Please find the v4 version of the patch that is in question: > > > > > > >From 7e27e4ac8f299ae244e9e0e90e0292ae2c08d37d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" > > > Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 23:41:21 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH v4 1/1] mm/vmalloc: Print a warning message first on failure > > > > Added, thanks. > > > > Matthew has a point of course, but I do think that any console driver > > which tries to allocate memory within the cotext of printk() is so > > pathetic that it isn't worth compromising core code to cater for it... > > I'm fine with v4 of this patch, fwiw. I saw no advantage to the earlier > version, but now that the advantage has been explained, the advantage > outweighs the disadvantage. Thanks! The point about an extra memory for printk is correct. From the other hand i am not able to recall issues related to lack of memory for printk() to emit a message. At least on our mobile devices i have not seen such scenarios. -- Vlad Rezki