From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, rientjes@google.com, penberg@kernel.org,
cl@linux.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
42.hyeyoo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm, slub: change run-time assertion in kmalloc_index() to compile-time
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 21:03:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210513120339.GA772931@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YJ0ACtMpasnoZdUp@elver.google.com>
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:31:38PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> ------ >8 ------
>
> From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] kfence: test: fix for "mm, slub: change run-time assertion in
> kmalloc_index() to compile-time"
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/slab.h | 9 +++++++--
> mm/kfence/kfence_test.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index 27d142564557..7a10bdc4b7a9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -350,7 +350,8 @@ static __always_inline enum kmalloc_cache_type kmalloc_type(gfp_t flags)
> * Note: there's no need to optimize kmalloc_index because it's evaluated
> * in compile-time.
> */
> -static __always_inline unsigned int kmalloc_index(size_t size)
> +static __always_inline unsigned int __kmalloc_index(size_t size,
> + bool size_is_constant)
> {
> if (!size)
> return 0;
> @@ -386,11 +387,15 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int kmalloc_index(size_t size)
> if (size <= 16 * 1024 * 1024) return 24;
> if (size <= 32 * 1024 * 1024) return 25;
>
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "unexpected size in kmalloc_index()");
> + if (size_is_constant)
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "unexpected size in kmalloc_index()");
> + else
> + BUG();
what about checking size it on top of kmalloc_index? because by definition of
KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH, it's not always 25. it can be less than 25. for some
situations.
below is what I suggested beofre. for just reference:
--- include/linux/slab.h.orig 2021-05-12 17:56:54.504738768 +0900
+++ include/linux/slab.h 2021-05-13 15:06:25.724565850 +0900
@@ -346,9 +346,18 @@ static __always_inline enum kmalloc_cach
* 1 = 65 .. 96 bytes
* 2 = 129 .. 192 bytes
* n = 2^(n-1)+1 .. 2^n
+ *
+ * Note: there's no need to optimize kmalloc_index because it's evaluated
+ * in compile-time.
*/
static __always_inline unsigned int kmalloc_index(size_t size)
{
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) {
+ BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE , "unexpected size in kmalloc_index()");
+ } else if (size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE) {
+ BUG();
+ }
+
if (!size)
return 0;
@@ -382,8 +391,6 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int kmal
if (size <= 8 * 1024 * 1024) return 23;
if (size <= 16 * 1024 * 1024) return 24;
if (size <= 32 * 1024 * 1024) return 25;
- if (size <= 64 * 1024 * 1024) return 26;
- BUG();
/* Will never be reached. Needed because the compiler may complain */
return -1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-13 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 17:34 [PATCH v3] mm, slub: change run-time assertion in kmalloc_index() to compile-time Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-11 17:38 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-11 18:08 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-13 2:52 ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-13 3:12 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-13 3:40 ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-13 6:28 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-13 8:46 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-13 8:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-13 10:31 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-13 11:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-13 12:08 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-13 12:10 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-13 12:03 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
2021-05-13 12:29 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-13 12:38 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-13 13:08 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-13 12:44 ` [PATCH] kfence: test: fix for "mm, slub: change run-time assertion in kmalloc_index() to compile-time" Marco Elver
2021-05-15 21:09 ` [PATCH v3] mm, slub: change run-time assertion in kmalloc_index() to compile-time Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-15 21:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-15 21:56 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-16 6:34 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-05-18 0:38 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-18 0:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-05-18 1:53 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-18 9:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-18 11:18 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-05-18 11:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-19 5:45 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210513120339.GA772931@hyeyoo \
--to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).