From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819B4C48BDF for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A6B617C9 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 34A6B617C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C47526B0070; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C1E116B0071; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:37:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B0CDE6B0072; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:37:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0079.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.79]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6A76B0070 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2057A180AD804 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:37:46 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78256514532.22.6C65CA9 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315EF6000144 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 287D568AFE; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:37:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:37:42 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Al Viro , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers Message-ID: <20210615163742.GC1600@lst.de> References: <20210615162342.1669332-1-willy@infradead.org> <20210615162342.1669332-4-willy@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210615162342.1669332-4-willy@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=none (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de has no SPF policy when checking 213.95.11.211) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 315EF6000144 X-Stat-Signature: k9fmbeqzkfq3p4qe1atioa5k3ybnuw84 X-HE-Tag: 1623775060-958845 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:23:39PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: > The only difference between iomap_set_page_dirty() and > __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() is that the latter includes a debugging > check that a !Uptodate page has private data. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig