From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D299FC48BE5 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A002610C8 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:48:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A002610C8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D6E566B006C; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D45546B006E; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:48:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BBFE96B0070; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:48:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0155.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.155]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867A96B006C for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 19:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBEB8249980 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:48:20 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78257599560.12.0D8562A Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40BDC005A20 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D8F161369; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:48:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1623800898; bh=MU+QgBNSQeAjAwvNJgbwfAcrLw//Mv1kPExB4e8vCXw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q8ADG2ZIioieYx3NSlF5YDr8udzfRscNEhba5uzHy7LSg1cPwM8N945yJ+Wxr0dtd 8fV16UuhlsOzrMAqwr7h1oACCbfGvRddETpDuM9H+DwDfoMFtqr2sZiWUCk1fhISq6 GBOMPKVCvUFKlXp2cHQj+GJdtqrH+CNR57OmbIL8= Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:48:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: HORIGUCHI =?UTF-8?B?TkFPWUE=?=(=?UTF-8?B?5aCA5Y+j44CA55u05Lmf?=) Cc: Naoya Horiguchi , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Linus Torvalds , Oscar Salvador , Michal Hocko , Tony Luck , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/hwpoison: do not lock page again when me_huge_page() successfully recovers Message-Id: <20210615164818.24d5c07c95ece3fcf82e7805@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210615035846.GA1807446@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> References: <20210609072029.74645-1-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com> <20210610165059.6618498250f60674c1bb9c03@linux-foundation.org> <20210611002329.GA1201351@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20210614193528.c2cc50d92eb76c4bea1b40e8@linux-foundation.org> <20210615035846.GA1807446@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=q8ADG2ZI; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A40BDC005A20 X-Stat-Signature: kx9qpfr96gonsjcoz88gfd5w7gko5wjx X-HE-Tag: 1623800889-641257 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000007, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 03:58:47 +0000 HORIGUCHI NAOYA(=E5=A0=80=E5=8F=A3=E3=80= =80=E7=9B=B4=E4=B9=9F) wrote: > > Should Tony's patchset also be targeted to -stable? If so then OK. >=20 > Yes, that's fine. And I think that the first two patches > (mm-memory-failure-use-a-mutex-to-avoid-memory_failure-races.pathc and > mmhwpoison-return-ehwpoison-to-denote-that-the-page-has-already-been-po= isoned.patch) > can be marked to stable, but 3/3 (mmhwpoison-send-sigbus-with-error-vir= utal-address.patch) > may not because it's a little too large and not the main part of the fi= xes. OK, thanks, I queued mm-memory-failure-use-a-mutex-to-avoid-memory_failure-races.patch mm-memory-failure-use-a-mutex-to-avoid-memory_failure-races-fix.patch mmhwpoison-return-ehwpoison-to-denote-that-the-page-has-already-been-pois= oned.patch # mm-hwpoison-do-not-lock-page-again-when-me_huge_page-successfully-recover= s.patch for 5.13 with cc:stable and mmhwpoison-send-sigbus-with-error-virutal-address.patch mmhwpoison-send-sigbus-with-error-virutal-address-fix.patch for 5.14.