From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>,
Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] arm64: an infinite loop in generic_perform_write()
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:32:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210623093220.GA3718@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNK4OSdoo/4wjhd7@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:27:37AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:24:54AM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> > On 2021/6/23 10:50, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:39:31AM +0800, Chen Huang wrote:
> > >
> > > > Then when kernel handles the alignment_fault, it will not panic. As the
> > > > arm64 memory model spec said, when the address is not a multiple of the
> > > > element size, the access is unaligned. Unaligned accesses are allowed to
> > > > addresses marked as Normal, but not to Device regions. An unaligned access
> > > > to a Device region will trigger an exception (alignment fault).
> > > >
> > > > do_alignment_fault
> > > > do_bad_area
> > > > __do_kernel_fault
> > > > fixup_exception
> > > >
> > > > But that fixup cann't handle the unaligned copy, so the
> > > > copy_page_from_iter_atomic returns 0 and traps in loop.
> > >
> > > Looks like you need to fix your raw_copy_from_user(), then...
> >
> > Exit loop when iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic() returns 0.
> > This should solve the problem, too, and it's easier.
>
> It might be easier, but it's not going to work correctly.
> If the page gets evicted by memory pressure, you are going
> to get spurious short write.
>
> Besides, it's simply wrong - write(2) does *NOT* require an
> aligned source. It (and raw_copy_from_user()) should act the
> same way memcpy(3) does.
On arm64, neither memcpy() nor raw_copy_from_user() are expected to work
on Device mappings, we have memcpy_fromio() for this but only for
ioremap(). There's no (easy) way to distinguish in the write() syscall
how the source buffer is mapped. generic_perform_write() does an
iov_iter_fault_in_readable() check but that's not sufficient and it also
breaks the cases where you can get intra-page faults (arm64 MTE or SPARC
ADI). I think in the general case it's racy anyway (another thread doing
an mprotect(PROT_NONE) after the readable check passed).
So I think generic_perform_write() returning -EFAULT if copied == 0
would make sense (well, unless it breaks other cases I'm not aware of).
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-23 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-23 2:39 [BUG] arm64: an infinite loop in generic_perform_write() Chen Huang
2021-06-23 2:50 ` Al Viro
2021-06-23 3:24 ` Xiaoming Ni
2021-06-23 4:27 ` Al Viro
2021-06-23 9:32 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2021-06-23 11:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-23 13:04 ` Al Viro
2021-06-23 13:22 ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-24 3:10 ` Chen Huang
2021-06-24 3:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-24 3:52 ` Chen Huang
2021-06-24 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-24 11:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-24 13:22 ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-24 16:27 ` Al Viro
2021-06-24 16:38 ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-24 16:39 ` Al Viro
2021-06-24 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-24 18:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-24 20:36 ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-25 10:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-28 16:22 ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-29 8:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-29 10:01 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-06 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-07-06 19:15 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-07 9:55 ` David Laight
2021-07-07 11:04 ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-07 12:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-24 15:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-06-24 16:17 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210623093220.GA3718@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenhuang5@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).