linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: Further fix __alloc_pages_bulk() return value
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:33:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210629153349.GG3840@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162497449506.16614.7781489905877008435.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 09:48:15AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> The author of commit b3b64ebd3822 ("mm/page_alloc: do bulk array
> bounds check after checking populated elements") was possibly
> confused by the mixture of return values throughout the function.
> 
> The API contract is clear that the function "Returns the number of
> pages on the list or array." It does not list zero as a unique
> return value with a special meaning. Therefore zero is a plausible
> return value only if @nr_pages is zero or less.
> 
> Clean up the return logic to make it clear that the returned value
> is always the total number of pages in the array/list, not the
> number of pages that were allocated during this call.
> 
> The only change in behavior with this patch is the value returned
> if prepare_alloc_pages() fails. To match the API contract, the
> number of pages currently in the array/list is returned in this
> case.
> 
> The call site in __page_pool_alloc_pages_slow() also seems to be
> confused on this matter. It should be attended to by someone who
> is familiar with that code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-29 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-29 13:48 [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: Further fix __alloc_pages_bulk() return value Chuck Lever
2021-06-29 15:33 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-06-29 16:04   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-06-29 16:01 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-06-29 16:32   ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-30  6:58   ` Mel Gorman
2021-06-30 11:22     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-06-30 12:05       ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210629153349.GG3840@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).