From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCFCC4320A for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EBF61265 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:19:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 78EBF61265 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 92CB18D000D; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:18:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8DD158D0002; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:18:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7C9368D000F; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:18:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0081.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.81]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495AE8D0002 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:18:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin37.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0387918019B37 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:18:53 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78496270146.37.2FBFE9C Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6498FB0000A2 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:18:52 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10082"; a="203964250" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,338,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="203964250" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2021 11:18:50 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,338,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="533074748" Received: from yyu32-desk.sc.intel.com ([143.183.136.146]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2021 11:18:49 -0700 From: Yu-cheng Yu To: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu , Haitao Huang , Rick P Edgecombe Cc: Yu-cheng Yu , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: [PATCH v29 20/32] mm: Update can_follow_write_pte() for shadow stack Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:11:49 -0700 Message-Id: <20210820181201.31490-21-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20210820181201.31490-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> References: <20210820181201.31490-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of yu-cheng.yu@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.126) smtp.mailfrom=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com X-Stat-Signature: jia51iyxs6wdswrehw7unu7qabsjsxbm X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6498FB0000A2 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-HE-Tag: 1629483532-77345 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Can_follow_write_pte() ensures a read-only page is COWed by checking the FOLL_COW flag, and uses pte_dirty() to validate the flag is still valid. Like a writable data page, a shadow stack page is writable, and becomes read-only during copy-on-write, but it is always dirty. Thus, in the can_follow_write_pte() check, it belongs to the writable page case and should be excluded from the read-only page pte_dirty() check. Apply the same changes to can_follow_write_pmd(). While at it, also split the long line into smaller ones. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Cc: Kees Cook --- v26: - Instead of passing vm_flags, pass down vma pointer to can_follow_write_= *(). v25: - Split long line into smaller ones. v24: - Change arch_shadow_stack_mapping() to is_shadow_stack_mapping(). --- mm/gup.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- mm/huge_memory.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c index b94717977d17..02dfba3141e7 100644 --- a/mm/gup.c +++ b/mm/gup.c @@ -478,10 +478,18 @@ static int follow_pfn_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vm= a, unsigned long address, * FOLL_FORCE can write to even unwritable pte's, but only * after we've gone through a COW cycle and they are dirty. */ -static inline bool can_follow_write_pte(pte_t pte, unsigned int flags) +static inline bool can_follow_write_pte(pte_t pte, unsigned int flags, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) { - return pte_write(pte) || - ((flags & FOLL_FORCE) && (flags & FOLL_COW) && pte_dirty(pte)); + if (pte_write(pte)) + return true; + if ((flags & (FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_COW)) !=3D (FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_COW)) + return false; + if (!pte_dirty(pte)) + return false; + if (is_shadow_stack_mapping(vma->vm_flags)) + return false; + return true; } =20 static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, @@ -524,7 +532,7 @@ static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_st= ruct *vma, } if ((flags & FOLL_NUMA) && pte_protnone(pte)) goto no_page; - if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !can_follow_write_pte(pte, flags)) { + if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !can_follow_write_pte(pte, flags, vma)) { pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl); return NULL; } diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index b9a6fc7af693..d35acb59dde9 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -1346,10 +1346,18 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct vm_fault *v= mf) * FOLL_FORCE can write to even unwritable pmd's, but only * after we've gone through a COW cycle and they are dirty. */ -static inline bool can_follow_write_pmd(pmd_t pmd, unsigned int flags) +static inline bool can_follow_write_pmd(pmd_t pmd, unsigned int flags, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) { - return pmd_write(pmd) || - ((flags & FOLL_FORCE) && (flags & FOLL_COW) && pmd_dirty(pmd)); + if (pmd_write(pmd)) + return true; + if ((flags & (FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_COW)) !=3D (FOLL_FORCE | FOLL_COW)) + return false; + if (!pmd_dirty(pmd)) + return false; + if (is_shadow_stack_mapping(vma->vm_flags)) + return false; + return true; } =20 struct page *follow_trans_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, @@ -1362,7 +1370,7 @@ struct page *follow_trans_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_s= truct *vma, =20 assert_spin_locked(pmd_lockptr(mm, pmd)); =20 - if (flags & FOLL_WRITE && !can_follow_write_pmd(*pmd, flags)) + if (flags & FOLL_WRITE && !can_follow_write_pmd(*pmd, flags, vma)) goto out; =20 /* Avoid dumping huge zero page */ --=20 2.21.0