From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53752C4320A for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7366127B for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:32:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org CC7366127B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 09C9A6B006C; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:32:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 04D366B0071; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:32:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E56CC6B0072; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:32:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0027.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.27]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B596B006C for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:32:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572268249980 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:32:54 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78512030268.03.AFAC277 Received: from mail-pj1-f50.google.com (mail-pj1-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7E4400208F for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f50.google.com with SMTP id j4-20020a17090a734400b0018f6dd1ec97so3709004pjs.3 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:32:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=eDJmVvgenVuiIv2JEnx8MK1MJtgJ4Z9SkKmag4UFJOE=; b=OHer6DSzHuzgbdiT8IIbRRDD+g7/i5dXXp4CBNVYTDQa+ehW/taWIkkf1fwUeoFzP8 txx2AOzpmJ638nD0PeREtA7aOJxXRZAjn8QnMwqpk5L3kgP6R5JQPeAAkfRZf9yomAaD W9/ZPZ6i14ukXTZYuiESo3p2auMy5i6FZdruk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=eDJmVvgenVuiIv2JEnx8MK1MJtgJ4Z9SkKmag4UFJOE=; b=F9wY3BAYy1nxEMp0ZcQhn7VNbXBaDIqdbA296x0uAbGHI0MZp1cnpOaBjvsG4Q/sw1 2vWHaigo+qL9390URCCjB9X2gU4V9TNwTEhC49LpzaNJmPZEJ+uc4+m68+NMfRPHVNQ3 5/WSy7UfApnjB9Xd9eAY3UoKu9a69MDOtd1o8LZXRG4ik06WzmJP2vjbd2ZGnmrvy+XH kpCThPj+Xa0exmUvmaZFwuN60J7gQboe34ybArqQi2fAwY7m5Kit65a+RBtMMOwfsC7z 2/W6ZqFPSSFnOVl/Q5CmWE3PDgu8l0zZVT6RFe7z/fi5F523BX3hl4PWOfLWbgzTWhIh VTjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530O5dgIbKfzo4byspeUDz4M3fSLjXRcYbQrAGnOmYTyWWbCej8y sHCkNyJb0ynzvD76+tfhBTvgYQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHK/HQN7ocahSaJv0B2/ksMf6ueoQEKg1gRTzT5mQ9oiv63nsCgteO9MtRHSmJVg1lf1b1KA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a604:b029:12c:dda2:30c4 with SMTP id u4-20020a170902a604b029012cdda230c4mr35345108plq.73.1629858772979; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e13sm20544264pfi.210.2021.08.24.19.32.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:32:51 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: David Gow Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rasmus Villemoes , Daniel Micay , Francis Laniel , Bart Van Assche , Linux Memory Management List , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 21/25] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY Message-ID: <202108241921.26866A8F@keescook> References: <20210822075122.864511-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20210822075122.864511-22-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: imf18.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=chromium.org header.s=google header.b=OHer6DSz; spf=pass (imf18.hostedemail.com: domain of keescook@chromium.org designates 209.85.216.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=keescook@chromium.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=chromium.org X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0D7E4400208F X-Stat-Signature: zgi73g8ikpng9mwbcnobjktriabdapdr X-HE-Tag: 1629858773-951645 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 03:00:19PM +0800, David Gow wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 3:56 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > > > Before changing anything about memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), add > > run-time tests to check basic behaviors for any regressions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > > --- > > Thanks for adding a KUnit test here: it's great to have better > coverage of some of these basic functions! > > There's a name mismatch with the Kconfig entry and the Makefile, > otherwise this looks good and works fine on my machine (under both UML > and qemu/x86_64). Hah! Whoops. Thanks for noticing this -- I think I didn't use a clean tree and never noticed because I had the old module. > It would be possible to split these tests up further if you wanted, > which could be useful if there's a desire to track the individual > assertion results independently. That's probably what I'd've done, but > It's a matter of personal preference either way, though: the tests > aren't absurdly huge or over-complicated as-is. Noted. Yeah, for me, I think it's "does memcpy work or not?" and each of the EXPECTs are required, so it felt like 1 test with lots of EXPECTs. > > +FORTIFY_SOURCE > > +M: Kees Cook > > +L: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org > > +S: Supported > > +F: include/linux/fortify-string.h > > +F: lib/test_fortify/* > > +F: scripts/test_fortify.sh > > +K: \b__NO_FORTIFY\b > > + > > Do you want this to be part of the memcpy() KUnit test commit, or is > it better suited in one of the changes to the actual fortify stuff? Whoops, thanks. This got --fixup'ed into the wrong patch. I've moved it now. > > FPGA DFL DRIVERS > > M: Wu Hao > > R: Tom Rix > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > index 831212722924..9199be57ba2a 100644 > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > @@ -2467,6 +2467,17 @@ config RATIONAL_KUNIT_TEST > > > > If unsure, say N. > > > > +config MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST > > + tristate "Test memcpy(), memmove(), and memset() functions at runtime" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS > > + depends on KUNIT > > + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS > > + help > > + Builds unit tests for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset() functions. > > + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer > > + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. > > + > > + If unsure, say N. > > + > > config TEST_UDELAY > > tristate "udelay test driver" > > help > > diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile > > index bd17c2bf43e1..8a4c8bdb38a2 100644 > > --- a/lib/Makefile > > +++ b/lib/Makefile > > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MIN_HEAP) += test_min_heap.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LKM) += test_module.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) += test_vmalloc.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_OVERFLOW) += test_overflow.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY) += test_memcpy.o > > This doesn't match CONFIG_MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST above, so the test is > never compiled in. Now fixed to be CONFIG_MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST. > > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_RHASHTABLE) += test_rhashtable.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_SORT) += test_sort.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_USER_COPY) += test_user_copy.o > > diff --git a/lib/test_memcpy.c b/lib/test_memcpy.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..ec546cec883e > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/lib/test_memcpy.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Test cases for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(). > > + */ > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +struct some_bytes { > > + union { > > + u8 data[32]; > > + struct { > > + u32 one; > > + u16 two; > > + u8 three; > > + /* 1 byte hole */ > > + u32 four[4]; > > + }; > > + }; > > +}; > > + > > +#define check(instance, v) do { \ > > + int i; \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(instance.data) != 32); \ > > + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(instance.data); i++) { \ > > + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, instance.data[i], v, \ > > + "line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %d (saw 0x%02x)\n", \ > > + __LINE__, #instance, v, i, instance.data[i]); \ > > + } \ > > +} while (0) > > + > > +#define compare(name, one, two) do { \ > > + int i; \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(one) != sizeof(two)); \ > > + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(one); i++) { \ > > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, one.data[i], two.data[i], \ > > + "line %d: %s.data[%d] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%d] (0x%02x)\n", \ > > + __LINE__, #one, i, one.data[i], #two, i, two.data[i]); \ > > + } \ > > + kunit_info(test, "ok: " TEST_OP "() " name "\n"); \ > > +} while (0) > > + > > +static void memcpy_test(struct kunit *test) > > +{ > > +#define TEST_OP "memcpy" > > + struct some_bytes control = { > > + .data = { 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes zero = { }; > > + struct some_bytes middle = { > > + .data = { 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, > > + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes three = { > > + .data = { 0x00, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes dest = { }; > > + int count; > > + u8 *ptr; > > + > > + /* Verify static initializers. */ > > + check(control, 0x20); > > + check(zero, 0); > > + compare("static initializers", dest, zero); > > + > > + /* Verify assignment. */ > > + dest = control; > > + compare("direct assignment", dest, control); > > + > > + /* Verify complete overwrite. */ > > + memcpy(dest.data, zero.data, sizeof(dest.data)); > > + compare("complete overwrite", dest, zero); > > + > > + /* Verify middle overwrite. */ > > + dest = control; > > + memcpy(dest.data + 12, zero.data, 7); > > + compare("middle overwrite", dest, middle); > > + > > + /* Verify argument side-effects aren't repeated. */ > > + dest = control; > > + ptr = dest.data; > > + count = 1; > > + memcpy(ptr++, zero.data, count++); > > + ptr += 8; > > + memcpy(ptr++, zero.data, count++); > > + compare("argument side-effects", dest, three); > > +#undef TEST_OP > > +} > > + > > +static void memmove_test(struct kunit *test) > > +{ > > +#define TEST_OP "memmove" > > + struct some_bytes control = { > > + .data = { 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes zero = { }; > > + struct some_bytes middle = { > > + .data = { 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, > > + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes five = { > > + .data = { 0x00, 0x00, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes overlap = { > > + .data = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, > > + 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes overlap_expected = { > > + .data = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x07, > > + 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, 0x99, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes dest = { }; > > + int count; > > + u8 *ptr; > > + > > + /* Verify static initializers. */ > > + check(control, 0x99); > > + check(zero, 0); > > + compare("static initializers", zero, dest); > > + > > + /* Verify assignment. */ > > + dest = control; > > + compare("direct assignment", dest, control); > > + > > + /* Verify complete overwrite. */ > > + memmove(dest.data, zero.data, sizeof(dest.data)); > > + compare("complete overwrite", dest, zero); > > + > > + /* Verify middle overwrite. */ > > + dest = control; > > + memmove(dest.data + 12, zero.data, 7); > > + compare("middle overwrite", dest, middle); > > + > > + /* Verify argument side-effects aren't repeated. */ > > + dest = control; > > + ptr = dest.data; > > + count = 2; > > + memmove(ptr++, zero.data, count++); > > + ptr += 9; > > + memmove(ptr++, zero.data, count++); > > + compare("argument side-effects", dest, five); > > + > > + /* Verify overlapping overwrite is correct. */ > > + ptr = &overlap.data[2]; > > + memmove(ptr, overlap.data, 5); > > + compare("overlapping write", overlap, overlap_expected); > > +#undef TEST_OP > > +} > > + > > +static void memset_test(struct kunit *test) > > +{ > > +#define TEST_OP "memset" > > + struct some_bytes control = { > > + .data = { 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes complete = { > > + .data = { 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, > > + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, > > + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, > > + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes middle = { > > + .data = { 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, > > + 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, > > + 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x31, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes three = { > > + .data = { 0x60, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + 0x30, 0x61, 0x61, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, > > + }, > > + }; > > + struct some_bytes dest = { }; > > + int count, value; > > + u8 *ptr; > > + > > + /* Verify static initializers. */ > > + check(control, 0x30); > > + check(dest, 0); > > + > > + /* Verify assignment. */ > > + dest = control; > > + compare("direct assignment", dest, control); > > + > > + /* Verify complete overwrite. */ > > + memset(dest.data, 0xff, sizeof(dest.data)); > > + compare("complete overwrite", dest, complete); > > + > > + /* Verify middle overwrite. */ > > + dest = control; > > + memset(dest.data + 4, 0x31, 16); > > + compare("middle overwrite", dest, middle); > > + > > + /* Verify argument side-effects aren't repeated. */ > > + dest = control; > > + ptr = dest.data; > > + value = 0x60; > > + count = 1; > > + memset(ptr++, value++, count++); > > + ptr += 8; > > + memset(ptr++, value++, count++); > > + compare("argument side-effects", dest, three); > > +#undef TEST_OP > > +} > > + > > +static struct kunit_case memcpy_test_cases[] = { > > + KUNIT_CASE(memset_test), > > + KUNIT_CASE(memcpy_test), > > + KUNIT_CASE(memmove_test), > > + {} > > +}; > > + > > +static struct kunit_suite memcpy_test_suite = { > > + .name = "memcpy-test", > > It may be better to just name the suite "memcpy", since -- by > definition -- it's a test if it's a KUnit test suite. Sounds good. I will adjust this. > > > + .test_cases = memcpy_test_cases, > > +}; > > + > > +kunit_test_suite(memcpy_test_suite); > > + > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > > -- > > 2.30.2 > > Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook