From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] bootconfig: Rename xbc_destroy_all() to xbc_fini()
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:26:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210916092630.48e01b5e@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <163177341667.682366.1520674275752512771.stgit@devnote2>
On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:23:36 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> Avoid using this noisy name and use more calm one.
> This is just a name change. No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/bootconfig.h | 2 +-
> init/main.c | 2 +-
> lib/bootconfig.c | 8 ++++----
> tools/bootconfig/main.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bootconfig.h b/include/linux/bootconfig.h
> index f955bb7eabbb..ba40194a339c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bootconfig.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bootconfig.h
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ int __init xbc_init(const char *buf, size_t size, const char **emsg, int *epos);
> int __init xbc_get_info(int *node_size, size_t *data_size);
>
> /* XBC cleanup data structures */
> -void __init xbc_destroy_all(void);
> +void __init xbc_fini(void);
>
> /* Debug dump functions */
> void __init xbc_debug_dump(void);
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 747b4fd38a1a..99a23324d4a1 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static void __init setup_boot_config(void)
>
> static void __init exit_boot_config(void)
> {
> - xbc_destroy_all();
> + xbc_fini();
I didn't know this was a thing. But looking for other use cases with
"*_fini(", there seems to be plenty of precedence in the kernel for this
change.
-- Steve
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-16 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-16 6:23 [PATCH v4 0/4] bootconfig: Fixes to bootconfig memory management etc Masami Hiramatsu
2021-09-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] bootconfig: init: Fix memblock leak in xbc_make_cmdline() Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-07 1:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-07 1:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-10-07 1:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-09-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] bootconfig: Allocate xbc_data inside xbc_init() Masami Hiramatsu
2021-09-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] bootconfig: Add xbc_get_info() for the node information Masami Hiramatsu
2021-09-16 6:23 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] bootconfig: Rename xbc_destroy_all() to xbc_fini() Masami Hiramatsu
2021-09-16 13:26 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-09-16 20:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-16 20:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-09-16 23:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210916092630.48e01b5e@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).