From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B360C433EF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6606C6B0071; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 06:25:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5E9026B0073; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 06:25:35 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 48A0E6B0074; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 06:25:35 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0214.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.214]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362D86B0071 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 06:25:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CD9181D75CA for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:25:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78996002988.18.C93DB16 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C6C140003 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D508616A5; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF5E9C36AE9; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:25:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1641381932; bh=pMGgyT4wR0n1pq4O32zNw0ilrjrmkSRYx/1mYiFCClY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=L3i7h1Q4SgxY77tkvMvsub8g/k31gW5g1CiIoRdjB+J8uT50TLwCVwtqZvw94SJoS ZG9bXOV8Ls63n5fNCVwiEh9tuPKon+ujytI+yylhsM0uWz/TGXFukoJr+Gmwg7xmbw S3lqMG3k7YS0YePNYl7JP/SSeOQLskPVkwDKttblhNOecyII6RFAXm9efmxzHDi8hg Yp4xhIyWyM8TnhcwaoQGuoixdS7uBuGjmtDTPCNYIDGSU7HfPx6ERWAf/y1Mw1ECUN ipHbGbZDAL0ZkCP3VlSk25WAjxBiGW1Hc3henkpKlyrguX6AbtGecdTV30FxFly7TK ba4rLzNT81PQw== From: SeongJae Park To: Yu Zhao Cc: SeongJae Park , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Hillf Danton , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Michal Hocko , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, page-reclaim@google.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Multigenerational LRU Framework Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:25:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20220105112527.23399-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 96C6C140003 X-Stat-Signature: yio7rsq3ti6z7zxtbcgeto34z7o8ob3x Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=L3i7h1Q4; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of sj@kernel.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sj@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-HE-Tag: 1641381920-797645 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 03:53:07 -0700 Yu Zhao wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:55:34AM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote: > > Hi Yu, > > > > On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:22:19 -0700 Yu Zhao wrote: [...] > > I think similar works are already available out of the box with the latest > > mainline tree, though it might be suboptimal in some cases. > > Ok, I will sound harsh because I hate it when people challenge facts > while having no idea what they are talking about. > > Our jobs are help the leadership make best decisions by providing them > with facts, not feeding them crap. I was using the word "similar", to represent this is only for a rough concept level similarity, rather than detailed facts. But, seems it was not enough, sorry. Anyway, I will not talk more and thus disturb you having the important discussion with leaders here, as you are asking. > > Don't get me wrong -- you are welcome to start another thread and have > a casual discussion with me. But this thread is not for that; it's for > the leadership and stakeholder to make a decision. Check who are in > "To" and "Cc" and what my request is. Haha. Ok, good luck for you. Thanks, SJ [...]