Re: mmotm 2022-02-08-15-31 uploaded (drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig)

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

Hi Nishanth,

nm@ti.com wrote on Wed, 9 Feb 2022 07:54:39 -0600:

> On 09:03-20220209, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Randy,
> > 
> > rdunlap@infradead.org wrote on Tue, 8 Feb 2022 22:30:23 -0800:
> >   
> > > On 2/8/22 15:31, Andrew Morton wrote:  
> > > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2022-02-08-15-31 has been uploaded to
> > > > 
> > > >    https://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> > > > 
> > > > mmotm-readme.txt says
> > > > 
> > > > README for mm-of-the-moment:
> > > > 
> > > > https://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> > > > 
> > > > This is a snapshot of my -mm patch queue.  Uploaded at random hopefully
> > > > more than once a week.
> > > > 
> > > > You will need quilt to apply these patches to the latest Linus release (5.x
> > > > or 5.x-rcY).  The series file is in broken-out.tar.gz and is duplicated in
> > > > https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/series
> > > > 
> > > > The file broken-out.tar.gz contains two datestamp files: .DATE and
> > > > .DATE-yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss.  Both contain the string yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss,
> > > > followed by the base kernel version against which this patch series is to
> > > > be applied.    
> > > 
> > > on i386:
> > > 
> > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for OMAP_GPMC
> > >   Depends on [n]: MEMORY [=y] && OF_ADDRESS [=n]
> > >   Selected by [y]:
> > >   - MTD_NAND_OMAP2 [=y] && MTD [=y] && MTD_RAW_NAND [=y] && (ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_KEYSTONE || ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && HAS_IOMEM [=y]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Full randconfig file is attached.  
> > 
> > + Uwe, + K3 people + Krzysztof  
> 
> Thanks for looping me in.
> 
> > 
> > Uwe already raised the issue, and this was proposed:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220127105652.1063624-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com/T/  
> 
> I will respond to the patch.
> 
> > 
> > Maybe we should have added K3 people in Cc but their MAINTAINERS entry
> > is incomplete so get_maintainers.pl did not immediately found them.  
> 
> What are we missing there?

Actually nothing is missing, I overlooked the file name. I touched
arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms in my patch and of course
get_maintainers.pl didn't look at the symbol owners. I should have
checked that myself manually in the first place.

Thanks,
Miquèl