From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] memcg: robust enforcement of memory.high
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:14:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220210081437.1884008-1-shakeelb@google.com> (raw)
Due to the semantics of memory.high enforcement i.e. throttle the
workload without oom-kill, we are trying to use it for right sizing the
workloads in our production environment. However we observed the
mechanism fails for some specific applications which does bug chunck of
allocations in a single syscall. The reason behind this failure is due
to the limitation of the memory.high enforcement's current
implementation. This patch series solves this issue by enforcing the
memory.high synchronously and making it more robust.
Shakeel Butt (4):
memcg: refactor mem_cgroup_oom
memcg: unify force charging conditions
selftests: memcg: test high limit for single entry allocation
memcg: synchronously enforce memory.high
include/linux/page_counter.h | 10 +
mm/memcontrol.c | 175 ++++++++++--------
mm/page_counter.c | 59 ++++--
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c | 15 +-
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.h | 1 +
.../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 78 ++++++++
6 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
--
2.35.1.265.g69c8d7142f-goog
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 8:14 Shakeel Butt [this message]
2022-02-10 8:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: refactor mem_cgroup_oom Shakeel Butt
2022-02-10 19:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-10 22:23 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-10 8:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: unify force charging conditions Shakeel Butt
2022-02-10 20:03 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-10 22:25 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-10 23:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-10 8:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests: memcg: test high limit for single entry allocation Shakeel Butt
2022-02-10 8:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: synchronously enforce memory.high Shakeel Butt
2022-02-10 20:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-10 22:22 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-10 23:29 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-02-10 23:53 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-11 2:44 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220210081437.1884008-1-shakeelb@google.com \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).