From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721B6C433EF for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9CCB38D0002; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 10:47:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 97B6A8D0001; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 10:47:41 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 86B558D0002; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 10:47:41 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.26]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B898D0001 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 10:47:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388E92208A for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:47:41 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79188989922.11.4CE31C5 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4009A40004 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:47:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1645976860; x=1677512860; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=7b9BDhbjud7dhVrRlKFY10rdSWsGIJjgZpLuh4LfgKA=; b=YX/LJozfkanceXVs3FIjhmaUBE6ZXM4N1YOxICOfNYyOTOZNxmL/G9G1 Ib1U6bZnY4jR4Jlofq/ar7JfwfXiYkRmoMUInoOxlIlrulES24CGF5Ntt 1fAkIC7kaTno4Xpihv3hyOm/ZNP76jrJPmlYtCxNIycNtMq6pl8X8XIEM 8rwkG3/CNCqm0znCQV2MxYnED8Sou9U4ygkA3MZGV7pNHujdRQ6E+K6Hb xD04Fm28fR+4+59nGeREnxtspmIomQfGFMCGo7CASDaurxm7Zx92wkUz5 +E1gbCM9/tCeD+rfiOvv4118aTldmQo/v8oeWKvNon6kHfD6AUApTe5hf g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10270"; a="251577746" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,141,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="251577746" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2022 07:47:39 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,141,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="640629548" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 788b1cd46f0d) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2022 07:47:36 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 788b1cd46f0d with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nOLln-0006aw-Er; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 15:47:35 +0000 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 23:46:56 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Shiyang Ruan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, djwong@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org, jane.chu@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/8] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS Message-ID: <202202272331.SP0o3f9L-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220227120747.711169-8-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220227120747.711169-8-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4009A40004 X-Stat-Signature: pskcnckz4fki6eb8s8sfssr6db6kbgsf Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="YX/LJozf"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.120) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com X-HE-Tag: 1645976860-704466 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Shiyang, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on xfs-linux/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linux/master] [cannot apply to hnaz-mm/master linus/master v5.17-rc5 next-20220225] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220227-200849 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git for-next config: riscv-randconfig-p001-20220227 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220227/202202272331.SP0o3f9L-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/9f4bfbd2bae60e9f172e0b7332b2af32aa5baa87 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220227-200849 git checkout 9f4bfbd2bae60e9f172e0b7332b2af32aa5baa87 # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): riscv64-linux-ld: fs/xfs/xfs_buf.o: in function `.L828': >> xfs_buf.c:(.text+0x3f7c): undefined reference to `dax_unregister_holder' riscv64-linux-ld: fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.o: in function `xfs_dax_notify_failure': >> xfs_notify_failure.c:(.text+0x2b0): undefined reference to `dax_holder' --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org