From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Daniel Dao" <dqminh@cloudflare.com>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>,
"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Roman Gushchin" <guro@fb.com>, "Feng Tang" <feng.tang@intel.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in workingset_refault latency on 5.15
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:09:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220228230949.xrmy6j2glxsoffko@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABWYdi2V=Vf-3+bbsvepo=ha4G1hdizGmg_zVj2pQqx6dHzufQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:08:04AM -0800, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:03 AM Michal Koutn� <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
> > BTW how many levels deep is the affected memory cgroup hierarchy (where
> > the workingset_refault happens)? (Self answer: Probably less than
> > nr_cpus*MEMCG_BATCH, so not relevant.)
> It's /system.slice/thingy.service (a regular systemd unit on
> cgroupv2), so not very deep.
Hi Ivan & Daniel,
Can you please try the following patch but without the async patch and
let us know if there is any difference in regression you are observing?
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 0abbd685703b..59014d20149a 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -999,6 +999,7 @@ static inline unsigned long
lruvec_page_state_local(struct lruvec *lruvec,
}
void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void);
+void mem_cgroup_flush_stats_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item
idx,
int val);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 36e9f38c919d..ae59bfc8788a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -642,14 +642,14 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct
mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
}
}
-static void __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void)
+static void __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
unsigned long flag;
if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&stats_flush_lock, flag))
return;
- cgroup_rstat_flush_irqsafe(root_mem_cgroup->css.cgroup);
+ cgroup_rstat_flush_irqsafe(memcg->css.cgroup);
atomic_set(&stats_flush_threshold, 0);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stats_flush_lock, flag);
}
@@ -657,12 +657,18 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void)
void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void)
{
if (atomic_read(&stats_flush_threshold) > num_online_cpus())
- __mem_cgroup_flush_stats();
+ __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(root_mem_cgroup);
+}
+
+void mem_cgroup_flush_stats_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+ if (atomic_read(&stats_flush_threshold) > num_online_cpus())
+ __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(memcg);
}
static void flush_memcg_stats_dwork(struct work_struct *w)
{
- __mem_cgroup_flush_stats();
+ __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(root_mem_cgroup);
queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &stats_flush_dwork, 2UL*HZ);
}
diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index 8c03afe1d67c..9b9ebc5e5110 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void
*shadow)
mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, WORKINGSET_REFAULT_BASE + file, nr);
- mem_cgroup_flush_stats();
+ mem_cgroup_flush_stats_memcg(eviction_memcg);
/*
* Compare the distance to the existing workingset size. We
* don't activate pages that couldn't stay resident even if
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-28 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-23 13:51 Regression in workingset_refault latency on 5.15 Daniel Dao
2022-02-23 15:57 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-23 16:00 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-23 17:07 ` Daniel Dao
2022-02-23 17:36 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-23 19:28 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-02-23 20:28 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-23 21:16 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-02-24 14:46 ` Daniel Dao
2022-02-24 16:58 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-24 17:34 ` Daniel Dao
2022-02-24 18:00 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-24 18:52 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-25 10:23 ` Daniel Dao
2022-02-25 17:08 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-02-25 17:22 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-25 18:03 ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-25 18:08 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-02-28 23:09 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2022-02-28 23:34 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-02-28 23:43 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-03-02 0:48 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-03-02 2:50 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-03-02 3:40 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-03-02 22:33 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-03-03 2:32 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-03-03 2:35 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-03-04 0:21 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-03-04 1:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-03-04 1:12 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-03-02 11:49 ` Frank Hofmann
2022-03-02 15:52 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-03-02 10:08 ` Michal Koutný
2022-03-02 15:53 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-03-02 17:28 ` Ivan Babrou
2022-02-24 9:22 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220228230949.xrmy6j2glxsoffko@google.com \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dqminh@cloudflare.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=ivan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox