public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterx@redhat.com, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 10/23] mm/shmem: Handle uffd-wp during fork()
Date: Fri,  4 Mar 2022 13:16:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304051708.86193-11-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220304051708.86193-1-peterx@redhat.com>

Normally we skip copy page when fork() for VM_SHARED shmem, but we can't skip
it anymore if uffd-wp is enabled on dst vma.  This should only happen when the
src uffd has UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK enabled on uffd-wp shmem vma, so that
VM_UFFD_WP will be propagated onto dst vma too, then we should copy the
pgtables with uffd-wp bit and pte markers, because these information will be
lost otherwise.

Since the condition checks will become even more complicated for deciding
"whether a vma needs to copy the pgtable during fork()", introduce a helper
vma_needs_copy() for it, so everything will be clearer.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index e3e67e32eb8a..e9e335ecb5dc 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -857,6 +857,14 @@ copy_nonpresent_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
 		if (try_restore_exclusive_pte(src_pte, src_vma, addr))
 			return -EBUSY;
 		return -ENOENT;
+	} else if (is_pte_marker_entry(entry)) {
+		/*
+		 * We're copying the pgtable should only because dst_vma has
+		 * uffd-wp enabled, do sanity check.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma));
+		set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+		return 0;
 	}
 	if (!userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma))
 		pte = pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(pte);
@@ -1225,6 +1233,38 @@ copy_p4d_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Return true if the vma needs to copy the pgtable during this fork().  Return
+ * false when we can speed up fork() by allowing lazy page faults later until
+ * when the child accesses the memory range.
+ */
+bool
+vma_needs_copy(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Always copy pgtables when dst_vma has uffd-wp enabled even if it's
+	 * file-backed (e.g. shmem). Because when uffd-wp is enabled, pgtable
+	 * contains uffd-wp protection information, that's something we can't
+	 * retrieve from page cache, and skip copying will lose those info.
+	 */
+	if (userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma))
+		return true;
+
+	if (src_vma->vm_flags & (VM_HUGETLB | VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP))
+		return true;
+
+	if (src_vma->anon_vma)
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't copy ptes where a page fault will fill them correctly.  Fork
+	 * becomes much lighter when there are big shared or private readonly
+	 * mappings. The tradeoff is that copy_page_range is more efficient
+	 * than faulting.
+	 */
+	return false;
+}
+
 int
 copy_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
 {
@@ -1238,14 +1278,7 @@ copy_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
 	bool is_cow;
 	int ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * Don't copy ptes where a page fault will fill them correctly.
-	 * Fork becomes much lighter when there are big shared or private
-	 * readonly mappings. The tradeoff is that copy_page_range is more
-	 * efficient than faulting.
-	 */
-	if (!(src_vma->vm_flags & (VM_HUGETLB | VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP)) &&
-	    !src_vma->anon_vma)
+	if (!vma_needs_copy(dst_vma, src_vma))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(src_vma))
-- 
2.32.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-04  5:16 [PATCH v7 00/23] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 01/23] mm: Introduce PTE_MARKER swap entry Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 02/23] mm: Teach core mm about pte markers Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 03/23] mm: Check against orig_pte for finish_fault() Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 04/23] mm/uffd: PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 05/23] mm/shmem: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 06/23] mm/shmem: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 07/23] mm/shmem: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 08/23] mm/shmem: Allow uffd wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 09/23] mm/shmem: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 11/23] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge pte version of uffd-wp helpers Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 12/23] mm/hugetlb: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 13/23] mm/hugetlb: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v7 14/23] mm/hugetlb: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 15/23] mm/hugetlb: Handle pte markers in page faults Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 16/23] mm/hugetlb: Allow uffd wr-protect none ptes Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 17/23] mm/hugetlb: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 18/23] mm/hugetlb: Handle uffd-wp during fork() Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 19/23] mm/khugepaged: Don't recycle vma pgtable if uffd-wp registered Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 20/23] mm/pagemap: Recognize uffd-wp bit for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 21/23] mm/uffd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 22/23] mm: Enable PTE markers by default Peter Xu
2022-03-04  5:17 ` [PATCH v7 23/23] selftests/uffd: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220304051708.86193-11-peterx@redhat.com \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox