From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D68C433FE for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id EBA3C6B0072; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:09:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E42C16B0073; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:09:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CE2DB6B0074; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:09:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.a.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.24]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0656B0072 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:09:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA95121B5E for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:09:42 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79279009404.12.8EA7471 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928C5C002A for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:09:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1648120181; x=1679656181; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=88Y7nd8cX7T1WR9HjlQBgeq9aRByaJ+VG3TomndjrcQ=; b=hrJgQh/N/Nie/Zo1ENqu7HaIEIXI0qGA5niQMRWZfUXTPYlNUyFxGPkO 0zfDdCh93fXFe8TWlEhvmcB1mVm7Az9KAyQ7cZjI9uKeidbn74k5aLg2K Y3AqIFP1TMeiJqGvJJxDyOXNtvGzi5d8k3+2vg5QsPzX9tOrMTEUafzxJ Ka5f62fwvOkNy/XPkSlqbCa+W+tTFmaSI5CklJMG709CmdRF7oZiw/+sn xS+ZBdBESXWrcIFET1Ie5yLwBz9dKuz6Xqi8mrDoG52+4LiCJyLjYkSgw Z51CMscpxprHCtGkicP2Tt4aGfIngYNy0/ObWhJK4ump/+l4Gcnf4jtUg w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10295"; a="238290320" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,207,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="238290320" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2022 04:09:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,207,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="584040294" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 89b41b6ae01c) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2022 04:09:34 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 89b41b6ae01c with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXLLR-000L0h-OF; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:09:33 +0000 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:08:57 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: andrey.konovalov@linux.dev, Marco Elver , Alexander Potapenko , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Andrew Morton Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , Andrey Konovalov , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Mark Rutland , Vincenzo Frascino , Sami Tolvanen , Peter Collingbourne , Evgenii Stepanov , Florian Mayer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64, scs: save scs_sp values per-cpu when switching stacks Message-ID: <202203241922.UDw4JHPD-lkp@intel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Stat-Signature: 9caadkmc6zddxi48qf4ruk64tootg1o8 Authentication-Results: imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="hrJgQh/N"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.136) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 928C5C002A X-HE-Tag: 1648120181-238246 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on next-20220323] [also build test ERROR on v5.17] [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core hnaz-mm/master linus/master v5.17 v5.17-rc8 v5.17-rc7] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/andrey-konovalov-linux-dev/kasan-arm64-scs-stacktrace-collect-stack-traces-from-Shadow-Call-Stack/20220323-233436 base: b61581ae229d8eb9f21f8753be3f4011f7692384 config: arm64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220324/202203241922.UDw4JHPD-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/da5bedb1ac7aa0b303f6d996d306e675860b6e12 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review andrey-konovalov-linux-dev/kasan-arm64-scs-stacktrace-collect-stack-traces-from-Shadow-Call-Stack/20220323-233436 git checkout da5bedb1ac7aa0b303f6d996d306e675860b6e12 # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7, from arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:248, from include/linux/irqflags.h:17, from include/linux/spinlock.h:58, from include/linux/irq.h:14, from arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:13: arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c: In function 'init_irq_scs': >> arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:44:25: error: 'irq_shadow_call_stack_ptr' undeclared (first use in this function) 44 | per_cpu(irq_shadow_call_stack_ptr, cpu) = | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:219:54: note: in definition of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 219 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:269:35: note: in expansion of macro 'per_cpu_ptr' 269 | #define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*per_cpu_ptr(&(var), cpu)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:44:17: note: in expansion of macro 'per_cpu' 44 | per_cpu(irq_shadow_call_stack_ptr, cpu) = | ^~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:44:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in 44 | per_cpu(irq_shadow_call_stack_ptr, cpu) = | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:219:54: note: in definition of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 219 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:269:35: note: in expansion of macro 'per_cpu_ptr' 269 | #define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*per_cpu_ptr(&(var), cpu)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:44:17: note: in expansion of macro 'per_cpu' 44 | per_cpu(irq_shadow_call_stack_ptr, cpu) = | ^~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c: At top level: arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:105:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'init_IRQ' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 105 | void __init init_IRQ(void) | ^~~~~~~~ vim +/irq_shadow_call_stack_ptr +44 arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 35 ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 36 static void init_irq_scs(void) ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 37 { ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 38 int cpu; ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 39 ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 40 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK)) ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 41 return; ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 42 ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 43 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 @44 per_cpu(irq_shadow_call_stack_ptr, cpu) = ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 45 scs_alloc(cpu_to_node(cpu)); ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 46 } ac20ffbb0279aa Sami Tolvanen 2020-11-30 47 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp