From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C5DC433EF for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 01:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C9DF86B0072; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C4C836B0073; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:42:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B15B16B0074; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:42:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.25]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31C26B0072 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C662415E for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 01:41:51 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79324752822.12.6AC8A0F Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC36A0009 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 01:41:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1649209310; x=1680745310; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pFeUDZdbHypjQysHermdGH2UeJrOWPlGH628yIS4cOM=; b=d5TQQdLOMpDDgjoy9I9oqT+htPCpac/6o6UYxOpTlq9yuZvnV7zG339s xgE3o1aA/rlrK6KeoHy37zqMtKY4q+ynsOeU/CAgYStz0TRLm8RpU7zzn 8xqImIwsrDh2l9Iy/jXU0s4fCA0PakAPPs5CCR/4+0L2xmzR0svHoJBv8 OvUcxuA8kYod2/CjDmgXR3cDkQwOq08N9n1BR3SouuoP7R5K7kRlbGosS 7idtXGs4pOaT9+OooWeSVKxGdYxj13zbScaCQzYessAhSo1iO1/p/fUtq Nfk0pTVlCuL/V8GqI4NDhcKUQSvOY0ZwcZVPzqYPxKNP5eKqQnbukae86 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10308"; a="324091423" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,238,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="324091423" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2022 18:41:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,238,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="641854568" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO a44fdfb70b94) ([10.239.97.151]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2022 18:41:44 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a44fdfb70b94 with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nbug3-0003xt-RO; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 01:41:43 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:41:05 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Peter Xu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Matthew Wilcox , Mike Rapoport , David Hildenbrand , Hugh Dickins , Jerome Glisse , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , Axel Rasmussen , Alistair Popple , peterx@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/23] mm/uffd: PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP Message-ID: <202204060938.eKyGvcev-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220405014838.14131-1-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220405014838.14131-1-peterx@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Stat-Signature: 9yw6a9o9ee5g3g8a1ad17uihpetu3rso Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=d5TQQdLO; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.100) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1EC36A0009 X-HE-Tag: 1649209309-18485 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Peter, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on hnaz-mm/master] [also build test ERROR on arnd-asm-generic/master linus/master v5.18-rc1 next-20220405] [cannot apply to linux/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Peter-Xu/userfaultfd-wp-Support-shmem-and-hugetlbfs/20220405-100136 base: https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master config: ia64-buildonly-randconfig-r005-20220405 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220406/202204060938.eKyGvcev-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/5baea0f03d347e5b13fff03af297858f1247d51a git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Peter-Xu/userfaultfd-wp-Support-shmem-and-hugetlbfs/20220405-100136 git checkout 5baea0f03d347e5b13fff03af297858f1247d51a # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=ia64 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h:153, from include/linux/pgtable.h:6, from arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h:40, from include/linux/uaccess.h:11, from include/linux/sched/task.h:11, from include/linux/sched/signal.h:9, from include/linux/rcuwait.h:6, from include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:7, from include/linux/fs.h:33, from arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c:10: arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'reload_context': arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:127:48: warning: variable 'old_rr4' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 127 | unsigned long rr0, rr1, rr2, rr3, rr4, old_rr4; | ^~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:14, from arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c:21: include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h: In function 'pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp': >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:243:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pte_marker_entry' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 243 | return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) && | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_marker_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: error: 'PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP' undeclared (first use in this function) 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c: At top level: arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c:71:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'ia64_getpriority' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 71 | ia64_getpriority (int which, int who) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c:85:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'sys_getpagesize' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 85 | sys_getpagesize (void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c:91:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'ia64_brk' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 91 | ia64_brk (unsigned long brk) | ^~~~~~~~ arch/ia64/kernel/sys_ia64.c:161:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'ia64_mremap' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 161 | ia64_mremap (unsigned long addr, unsigned long old_len, unsigned long new_len, unsigned long flags, | ^~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- In file included from arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h:153, from include/linux/pgtable.h:6, from arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h:40, from include/linux/uaccess.h:11, from include/linux/sched/task.h:11, from kernel/fork.c:23: arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'reload_context': arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:127:48: warning: variable 'old_rr4' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 127 | unsigned long rr0, rr1, rr2, rr3, rr4, old_rr4; | ^~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:14, from kernel/fork.c:52: include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h: In function 'pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp': >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:243:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pte_marker_entry' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 243 | return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) && | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_marker_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: error: 'PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP' undeclared (first use in this function) 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in kernel/fork.c: At top level: kernel/fork.c:163:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_release_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 163 | void __weak arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/fork.c:853:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_task_cache_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 853 | void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { } | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/fork.c:948:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_dup_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 948 | int __weak arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- In file included from arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h:153, from include/linux/pgtable.h:6, from include/linux/mm.h:29, from kernel/sysctl.c:23: arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'reload_context': arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:127:48: warning: variable 'old_rr4' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 127 | unsigned long rr0, rr1, rr2, rr3, rr4, old_rr4; | ^~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:14, from kernel/sysctl.c:46: include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h: In function 'pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp': >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:243:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pte_marker_entry' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 243 | return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) && | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_marker_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: error: 'PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP' undeclared (first use in this function) 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- In file included from arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h:153, from include/linux/pgtable.h:6, from include/linux/mm.h:29, from mm/vmscan.c:15: arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'reload_context': arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:127:48: warning: variable 'old_rr4' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 127 | unsigned long rr0, rr1, rr2, rr3, rr4, old_rr4; | ^~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:14, from include/linux/migrate.h:8, from mm/vmscan.c:44: include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h: In function 'pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp': >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:243:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pte_marker_entry' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 243 | return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) && | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_marker_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: error: 'PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP' undeclared (first use in this function) 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in In file included from mm/vmscan.c:57: include/linux/swapops.h: At top level: >> include/linux/swapops.h:289:20: error: conflicting types for 'is_pte_marker_entry'; have 'bool(swp_entry_t)' {aka '_Bool(swp_entry_t)'} 289 | static inline bool is_pte_marker_entry(swp_entry_t entry) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:14, from include/linux/migrate.h:8, from mm/vmscan.c:44: include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:243:16: note: previous implicit declaration of 'is_pte_marker_entry' with type 'int()' 243 | return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) && | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from mm/vmscan.c:57: >> include/linux/swapops.h:294:26: error: conflicting types for 'pte_marker_get'; have 'pte_marker(swp_entry_t)' {aka 'long unsigned int(swp_entry_t)'} 294 | static inline pte_marker pte_marker_get(swp_entry_t entry) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:14, from include/linux/migrate.h:8, from mm/vmscan.c:44: include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:14: note: previous implicit declaration of 'pte_marker_get' with type 'int()' 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- In file included from arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h:153, from include/linux/pgtable.h:6, from arch/ia64/include/asm/uaccess.h:40, from include/linux/uaccess.h:11, from include/linux/sched/task.h:11, from include/linux/sched/signal.h:9, from include/linux/rcuwait.h:6, from include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:7, from include/linux/fs.h:33, from fs/proc/meminfo.c:2: arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'reload_context': arch/ia64/include/asm/mmu_context.h:127:48: warning: variable 'old_rr4' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 127 | unsigned long rr0, rr1, rr2, rr3, rr4, old_rr4; | ^~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:14, from fs/proc/meminfo.c:6: include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h: In function 'pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp': >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:243:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pte_marker_entry' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 243 | return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) && | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_marker_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: error: 'PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP' undeclared (first use in this function) 244 | (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h:244:38: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in fs/proc/meminfo.c: At top level: fs/proc/meminfo.c:22:28: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_report_meminfo' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 22 | void __attribute__((weak)) arch_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/is_pte_marker_entry +243 include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h 240 241 static inline bool pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp(swp_entry_t entry) 242 { > 243 return is_pte_marker_entry(entry) && > 244 (pte_marker_get(entry) & PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP); 245 } 246 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp