linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	ying.huang@intel.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
	shy828301@gmail.com, weixugc@google.com, gthelen@google.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/7] drivers/base/node: Add support to write node_states[] via sysfs
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 01:25:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220422195516.10769-4-jvgediya@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422195516.10769-1-jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>

Current /sys/devices/system/node/* interface doesn't support
to write node_states[], however write support is needed in case
users want to set them manually e.g. when user want to override
default N_DEMOTION_TARGETS found by the kernel.

Rename existing _NODE_ATTR to _NODE_ATTR_RO and introduce new
_NODE_ATTR_RW which can be used for node_states[] which can
be written from sysfs.

It may be necessary to validate written values and take action
based on them in a state specific way so a callback 'write' is
introduced in 'struct node_attr'.

A new function demotion_targets_write() is added to validate
the input nodes for N_DEMOTION_TARGETS which should be subset
of N_MEMORY and to build new demotion list based on new nodes.

Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/base/node.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
index 6eef22e6413e..e03eedbc421b 100644
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/swap.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/migrate.h>
 
 static struct bus_type node_subsys = {
 	.name = "node",
@@ -1013,6 +1014,7 @@ void unregister_one_node(int nid)
 struct node_attr {
 	struct device_attribute attr;
 	enum node_states state;
+	int (*write)(nodemask_t nodes);
 };
 
 static ssize_t show_node_state(struct device *dev,
@@ -1024,23 +1026,57 @@ static ssize_t show_node_state(struct device *dev,
 			  nodemask_pr_args(&node_states[na->state]));
 }
 
-#define _NODE_ATTR(name, state) \
-	{ __ATTR(name, 0444, show_node_state, NULL), state }
+static ssize_t store_node_state(struct device *s,
+				struct device_attribute *attr,
+				const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+	nodemask_t nodes;
+	struct node_attr *na = container_of(attr, struct node_attr, attr);
+
+	if (nodelist_parse(buf, nodes))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (na->write) {
+		if (na->write(nodes))
+			return -EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		node_states[na->state] = nodes;
+	}
+
+	return count;
+}
+
+static int demotion_targets_write(nodemask_t nodes)
+{
+	if (nodes_subset(nodes, node_states[N_MEMORY])) {
+		node_states[N_DEMOTION_TARGETS] = nodes;
+		set_migration_target_nodes();
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+#define _NODE_ATTR_RO(name, state) \
+	{ __ATTR(name, 0444, show_node_state, NULL), state, NULL }
+
+#define _NODE_ATTR_RW(name, state, write_fn) \
+	{ __ATTR(name, 0644, show_node_state, store_node_state), state, write_fn }
 
 static struct node_attr node_state_attr[] = {
-	[N_POSSIBLE] = _NODE_ATTR(possible, N_POSSIBLE),
-	[N_ONLINE] = _NODE_ATTR(online, N_ONLINE),
-	[N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_normal_memory, N_NORMAL_MEMORY),
+	[N_POSSIBLE] = _NODE_ATTR_RO(possible, N_POSSIBLE),
+	[N_ONLINE] = _NODE_ATTR_RO(online, N_ONLINE),
+	[N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR_RO(has_normal_memory, N_NORMAL_MEMORY),
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
-	[N_HIGH_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_high_memory, N_HIGH_MEMORY),
+	[N_HIGH_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR_RO(has_high_memory, N_HIGH_MEMORY),
 #endif
-	[N_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_memory, N_MEMORY),
-	[N_CPU] = _NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU),
-	[N_GENERIC_INITIATOR] = _NODE_ATTR(has_generic_initiator,
-					   N_GENERIC_INITIATOR),
-	[N_DEMOTION_TARGETS] = _NODE_ATTR(demotion_targets,
-					  N_DEMOTION_TARGETS),
-
+	[N_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR_RO(has_memory, N_MEMORY),
+	[N_CPU] = _NODE_ATTR_RO(has_cpu, N_CPU),
+	[N_GENERIC_INITIATOR] = _NODE_ATTR_RO(has_generic_initiator,
+					      N_GENERIC_INITIATOR),
+	[N_DEMOTION_TARGETS] = _NODE_ATTR_RW(demotion_targets,
+					     N_DEMOTION_TARGETS,
+					     demotion_targets_write),
 };
 
 static struct attribute *node_state_attrs[] = {
-- 
2.35.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 19:55 [PATCH v3 0/7] mm: demotion: Introduce new node state N_DEMOTION_TARGETS Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-22 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: demotion: Fix demotion targets sharing among sources Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-24  3:25   ` ying.huang
2022-04-25  9:32     ` Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-26  7:26       ` ying.huang
2022-04-22 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm: demotion: Add new node state N_DEMOTION_TARGETS Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-22 20:29   ` Wei Xu
2022-04-22 19:55 ` Jagdish Gediya [this message]
2022-04-22 20:32   ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drivers/base/node: Add support to write node_states[] via sysfs Wei Xu
2022-04-24  6:25   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-04-25  9:42     ` Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-24  6:29   ` ying.huang
2022-04-22 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] device-dax/kmem: Set node state as N_DEMOTION_TARGETS Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-22 20:34   ` Wei Xu
2022-04-22 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm: demotion: Build demotion list based on N_DEMOTION_TARGETS Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-22 20:39   ` Wei Xu
2022-04-22 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm: demotion: expose per-node demotion targets via sysfs Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-22 20:47   ` Wei Xu
2022-04-23  7:30   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-23  8:38   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-22 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] docs: numa: Add documentation for demotion Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-24  3:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] mm: demotion: Introduce new node state N_DEMOTION_TARGETS ying.huang
2022-04-25 11:15   ` Jagdish Gediya
2022-04-25 13:57     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-25 14:44       ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-04-26 10:43         ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-27  1:29         ` ying.huang
2022-04-27  2:57           ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-04-27  3:34             ` ying.huang
2022-04-25 14:53       ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-04-26 10:37         ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-26  7:55     ` ying.huang
2022-04-26  9:07       ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-04-26  9:10         ` ying.huang
2022-04-26  9:37       ` Jagdish Gediya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220422195516.10769-4-jvgediya@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=jvgediya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).