linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>,
	Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] x86/pm: fix false positive kmemleak report in msr_build_context()
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:21:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220426202138.498310-1-matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> (raw)

Since commit e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume"),
kmemleak reports this issue:

  unreferenced object 0xffff888009cedc00 (size 256):
    comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294693823 (age 73.764s)
    hex dump (first 32 bytes):
      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ........H.......
      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    backtrace:
      msr_build_context (include/linux/slab.h:621)
      pm_check_save_msr (arch/x86/power/cpu.c:520)
      do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1298)
      kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1370)
      kernel_init (init/main.c:1504)
      ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304)

It is easy to reproduce it on my side:

  - boot the VM with a debug kernel config (see the 'Closes:' tag)
  - wait ~1 minute
  - start a kmemleak scan

It seems kmemleak has an issue with the array allocated in
msr_build_context(). This array is assigned to a pointer in a static
structure (saved_context.saved_msrs->array): there is no leak then.

A simple fix for this issue would be to use kmemleak_no_leak() but Mat
noticed that the root cause here is alignment within the packed 'struct
saved_context' (from suspend_64.h). Kmemleak only searches for pointers
that are aligned (see how pointers are scanned in kmemleak.c), but
pahole shows that the saved_msrs struct member and all members after it
in the structure are unaligned:

  struct saved_context {
    struct pt_regs             regs;                 /*     0   168 */
    /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 40 bytes ago --- */
    u16                        ds;                   /*   168     2 */
    u16                        es;                   /*   170     2 */
    u16                        fs;                   /*   172     2 */
    u16                        gs;                   /*   174     2 */
    long unsigned int          kernelmode_gs_base;   /*   176     8 */
    long unsigned int          usermode_gs_base;     /*   184     8 */
    /* --- cacheline 3 boundary (192 bytes) --- */
    long unsigned int          fs_base;              /*   192     8 */
    long unsigned int          cr0;                  /*   200     8 */
    long unsigned int          cr2;                  /*   208     8 */
    long unsigned int          cr3;                  /*   216     8 */
    long unsigned int          cr4;                  /*   224     8 */
    u64                        misc_enable;          /*   232     8 */
    bool                       misc_enable_saved;    /*   240     1 */

   /* Note below odd offset values for the remainder of this struct */

    struct saved_msrs          saved_msrs;           /*   241    16 */
    /* --- cacheline 4 boundary (256 bytes) was 1 bytes ago --- */
    long unsigned int          efer;                 /*   257     8 */
    u16                        gdt_pad;              /*   265     2 */
    struct desc_ptr            gdt_desc;             /*   267    10 */
    u16                        idt_pad;              /*   277     2 */
    struct desc_ptr            idt;                  /*   279    10 */
    u16                        ldt;                  /*   289     2 */
    u16                        tss;                  /*   291     2 */
    long unsigned int          tr;                   /*   293     8 */
    long unsigned int          safety;               /*   301     8 */
    long unsigned int          return_address;       /*   309     8 */

    /* size: 317, cachelines: 5, members: 25 */
    /* last cacheline: 61 bytes */
  } __attribute__((__packed__));

By moving 'misc_enable_saved' to the end of the struct declaration,
'saved_msrs' fits in before the cacheline 4 boundary and the kmemleak
warning goes away.

The comment above the 'saved_context' declaration says to fix
wakeup_64.S file and __save/__restore_processor_state() if the struct is
modified: it looks like all the accesses in wakeup_64.S are done through
offsets which are computed at build-time. This comment has been updated
accordingly.

At the end, the false positive kmemleak report is due to a limitation
from kmemleak but that's always good to avoid unaligned member for
optimisation purposes.

Please note that it looks like this issue is not new, e.g.

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/9f1bb619-c4ee-21c4-a251-870bd4db04fa@lwfinger.net/
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/94e48fcd-1dbd-ebd2-4c91-f39941735909@molgen.mpg.de/

But on my side, msr_build_context() is only used since:

  commit e2a1256b17b1 ("x86/speculation: Restore speculation related MSRs during S3 resume").

Others probably have the same issue since:

  commit 7a9c2dd08ead ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume"),

Hence the 'Fixes' tag here below to help with the backports.

Fixes: 7a9c2dd08ead ("x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume")
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/268
Suggested-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
---

Notes:
    v3:
     - update the comment above 'saved_context' structure (Borislav)
    v2:
     - update 'saved_context' structure instead of using kmemleak_no_leak() (Mat)

 arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h | 12 ++++++++----
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h
index 7b132d0312eb..a800abb1a992 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_32.h
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ struct saved_context {
 	u16 gs;
 	unsigned long cr0, cr2, cr3, cr4;
 	u64 misc_enable;
-	bool misc_enable_saved;
 	struct saved_msrs saved_msrs;
 	struct desc_ptr gdt_desc;
 	struct desc_ptr idt;
@@ -28,6 +27,7 @@ struct saved_context {
 	unsigned long tr;
 	unsigned long safety;
 	unsigned long return_address;
+	bool misc_enable_saved;
 } __attribute__((packed));
 
 /* routines for saving/restoring kernel state */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h
index 35bb35d28733..0dc400fae1b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/suspend_64.h
@@ -14,9 +14,13 @@
  * Image of the saved processor state, used by the low level ACPI suspend to
  * RAM code and by the low level hibernation code.
  *
- * If you modify it, fix arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S and make sure that
- * __save/__restore_processor_state(), defined in arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c,
- * still work as required.
+ * If you modify it, check how it is used in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S
+ * and make sure that __save/__restore_processor_state(), defined in
+ * arch/x86/power/cpu.c, still work as required.
+ *
+ * Because the structure is packed, make sure to avoid unaligned members. For
+ * optimisations purposes but also because tools like Kmemleak only search for
+ * pointers that are aligned.
  */
 struct saved_context {
 	struct pt_regs regs;
@@ -36,7 +40,6 @@ struct saved_context {
 
 	unsigned long cr0, cr2, cr3, cr4;
 	u64 misc_enable;
-	bool misc_enable_saved;
 	struct saved_msrs saved_msrs;
 	unsigned long efer;
 	u16 gdt_pad; /* Unused */
@@ -48,6 +51,7 @@ struct saved_context {
 	unsigned long tr;
 	unsigned long safety;
 	unsigned long return_address;
+	bool misc_enable_saved;
 } __attribute__((packed));
 
 #define loaddebug(thread,register) \
-- 
2.34.1



             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-26 20:21 Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2022-04-27 16:33 ` [PATCH v3] x86/pm: fix false positive kmemleak report in msr_build_context() Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220426202138.498310-1-matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --to=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).