From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/12] mm/demotion: Add pg_data_t member to track node memory tier details
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:52:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202206230603.yUtYS0xk-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622082513.467538-9-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Hi "Aneesh,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/mm-demotion-Memory-tiers-and-demotion/20220622-163031
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-kselftests (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220623/202206230603.yUtYS0xk-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.4-31-g4880bd19-dirty
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/97a1874c652abe1500768e5cab39b2d3dcdfb046
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/mm-demotion-Memory-tiers-and-demotion/20220622-163031
git checkout 97a1874c652abe1500768e5cab39b2d3dcdfb046
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> mm/memory-tiers.c:182:16: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
>> mm/memory-tiers.c:182:16: sparse: struct memory_tier [noderef] __rcu *
>> mm/memory-tiers.c:182:16: sparse: struct memory_tier *
mm/memory-tiers.c:214:27: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
mm/memory-tiers.c:214:27: sparse: struct memory_tier [noderef] __rcu *
mm/memory-tiers.c:214:27: sparse: struct memory_tier *
mm/memory-tiers.c:216:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
mm/memory-tiers.c:216:9: sparse: struct memory_tier [noderef] __rcu *
mm/memory-tiers.c:216:9: sparse: struct memory_tier *
mm/memory-tiers.c:221:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
mm/memory-tiers.c:221:9: sparse: struct memory_tier [noderef] __rcu *
mm/memory-tiers.c:221:9: sparse: struct memory_tier *
mm/memory-tiers.c:361:19: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
mm/memory-tiers.c:361:19: sparse: struct memory_tier [noderef] __rcu *
mm/memory-tiers.c:361:19: sparse: struct memory_tier *
mm/memory-tiers.c:614:17: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
mm/memory-tiers.c:614:17: sparse: struct memory_tier [noderef] __rcu *
mm/memory-tiers.c:614:17: sparse: struct memory_tier *
vim +182 mm/memory-tiers.c
169
170 static struct memory_tier *__node_get_memory_tier(int node)
171 {
172 pg_data_t *pgdat;
173
174 pgdat = NODE_DATA(node);
175 if (!pgdat)
176 return NULL;
177 /*
178 * Since we hold memory_tier_lock, we can avoid
179 * RCU read locks when accessing the details. No
180 * parallel updates are possible here.
181 */
> 182 return rcu_dereference_check(pgdat->memtier,
183 lockdep_is_held(&memory_tier_lock));
184 }
185
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 8:25 [PATCH v7 00/12] mm/demotion: Memory tiers and demotion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] mm/demotion: Move memory demotion related code Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] mm/demotion/dax/kmem: Set node's memory tier to MEMORY_TIER_PMEM Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] mm/demotion: Add hotplug callbacks to handle new numa node onlined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] mm/demotion: Build demotion targets based on explicit memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] mm/demotion: Expose memory tier details via sysfs Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] mm/demotion: Add per node memory tier attribute to sysfs Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] mm/demotion: Add pg_data_t member to track node memory tier details Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 22:52 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] mm/demotion: Demote pages according to allocation fallback order Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-23 2:53 ` Alistair Popple
2022-06-27 3:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-27 4:18 ` Alistair Popple
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] mm/demotion: Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] mm/demotion: Add documentation for memory tiering Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 21:21 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-25 2:56 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-25 4:13 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-27 4:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-30 0:57 ` Souptick Joarder
2022-06-22 8:25 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] mm/demotion: Add sysfs ABI documentation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-22 11:06 ` [PATCH v7 00/12] mm/demotion: Memory tiers and demotion Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202206230603.yUtYS0xk-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hesham.almatary@huawei.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).