linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [mm-unstable PATCH v5 1/8] mm/hugetlb: check gigantic_page_runtime_supported() in return_unused_surplus_pages()
Date: Fri,  8 Jul 2022 14:36:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220708053653.964464-2-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220708053653.964464-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>

From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>

I found a weird state of 1GB hugepage pool, caused by the following
procedure:

  - run a process reserving all free 1GB hugepages,
  - shrink free 1GB hugepage pool to zero (i.e. writing 0 to
    /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages), then
  - kill the reserving process.

, then all the hugepages are free *and* surplus at the same time.

  $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages
  3
  $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/free_hugepages
  3
  $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/resv_hugepages
  0
  $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/surplus_hugepages
  3

This state is resolved by reserving and allocating the pages then
freeing them again, so this seems not to result in serious problem.
But it's a little surprising (shrinking pool suddenly fails).

This behavior is caused by hstate_is_gigantic() check in
return_unused_surplus_pages(). This was introduced so long ago in 2008
by commit aa888a74977a ("hugetlb: support larger than MAX_ORDER"), and
at that time the gigantic pages were not supposed to be allocated/freed
at run-time.  Now kernel can support runtime allocation/free, so let's
check gigantic_page_runtime_supported() together.

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
---
v4 -> v5:
- drop additional gigantic_page_runtime_supported() checks.

v2 -> v3:
- Fixed typo in patch description,
- add !gigantic_page_runtime_supported() check instead of removing
  hstate_is_gigantic() check (suggested by Miaohe and Muchun)
- add a few more !gigantic_page_runtime_supported() check in
  set_max_huge_pages() (by Mike).
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index a4506ed1f1db..cf8ccee7654c 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2432,8 +2432,7 @@ static void return_unused_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h,
 	/* Uncommit the reservation */
 	h->resv_huge_pages -= unused_resv_pages;
 
-	/* Cannot return gigantic pages currently */
-	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
+	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h) && !gigantic_page_runtime_supported())
 		goto out;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.25.1



  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-08  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-08  5:36 [mm-unstable PATCH v5 0/8] mm, hwpoison: enable 1GB hugepage support (v5) Naoya Horiguchi
2022-07-08  5:36 ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2022-07-11  1:55   ` [mm-unstable PATCH v5 1/8] mm/hugetlb: check gigantic_page_runtime_supported() in return_unused_surplus_pages() Miaohe Lin
2022-07-08  5:36 ` [mm-unstable PATCH v5 2/8] mm/hugetlb: make pud_huge() and follow_huge_pud() aware of non-present pud entry Naoya Horiguchi
2022-07-08  5:36 ` [mm-unstable PATCH v5 3/8] mm, hwpoison, hugetlb: support saving mechanism of raw error pages Naoya Horiguchi
2022-07-11  3:26   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-11  5:51     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-07-11  7:14       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-08  5:36 ` [mm-unstable PATCH v5 4/8] mm, hwpoison: make unpoison aware of raw error info in hwpoisoned hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2022-07-11  7:09   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-11  9:24     ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-07-11 11:13       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-07-08  5:36 ` [mm-unstable PATCH v5 5/8] mm, hwpoison: set PG_hwpoison for busy hugetlb pages Naoya Horiguchi
2022-07-08  5:36 ` [mm-unstable PATCH v5 6/8] mm, hwpoison: make __page_handle_poison returns int Naoya Horiguchi
2022-07-08  5:36 ` [mm-unstable PATCH v5 7/8] mm, hwpoison: skip raw hwpoison page in freeing 1GB hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2022-07-08  5:36 ` [mm-unstable PATCH v5 8/8] mm, hwpoison: enable memory error handling on " Naoya Horiguchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220708053653.964464-2-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
    --to=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).