From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MM updates for 5.20-rc1
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 17:07:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220805170752.d609551360017d60903e5e75@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yu2wDNcOYE0RdkA3@P9FQF9L96D.corp.robot.car>
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 17:04:28 -0700 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 04:32:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 1:35 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > - memcg debug/visibility work from Roman Gushchin
> >
> > Well, not just memcg.
> >
> > There's that new CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG too.
> >
> > Which looks like yet another "people add Kconfig options incorrectly".
> >
> > We don't make new features "default y" unless there's some truly
> > pressing reason for it (ie "99.9% of all people will want this" or "we
> > used to always compile this in, now it's optional").
>
> Hi Linus!
>
> It actually was 'default n' in one of the earlier version of the patchset
> and has been switched to 'default y' based on the following feedback from
> Dave Chinner (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YmiWK56bOHyrr64u@rh/):
>
> No. The argument that "if we turn it off there's no overhead" means
> one of two things:
>
> 1. nobody turns it on and it never gets tested and so bitrots and is
> useless, or
> 2. distro's all turn it on because some tool they ship or customer
> they ship to wants it.
>
> Either way, hiding it behind a config option is not an acceptible
> solution for mering poorly thought out infrastructure.
>
> Personally I think that the feature is not that useful for the majority
> of users (this is why default was n), but it's not adding much of the
> overhead, so I had no strong reasons to oppose Dave.
> Cc'ing him just in case.
>
We should have changelogged these considerations.
I've asked Joe if checkpatch can get a "default y" detector, to draw
attention to this in the future.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-06 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 20:35 [GIT PULL] MM updates for 5.20-rc1 Andrew Morton
2022-08-05 23:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-06 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-05 23:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-06 0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-08-06 0:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-08-06 1:43 ` Joe Perches
2022-08-05 23:40 ` pr-tracker-bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-07 5:14 Yury Norov
2022-08-07 20:11 ` Sander Vanheule
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220805170752.d609551360017d60903e5e75@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox