linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shaoqin.huang@intel.com
To: rppt@kernel.org
Cc: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>,
	Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@gmail.com>,
	Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_add() 129th region
Date: Fri,  2 Sep 2022 10:39:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220902024007.58041-2-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902024007.58041-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com>

From: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>

Add 129th region into the memblock, and this will trigger the
memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So
using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate some valid memory region,
and add it into the memblock. It make sure the memblock_double_array()
will always choose the valid memory region that is allocated by the
dummy_physical_memory_init(). So memblock_double_array() must success.

Another thing should be done is to restore the memory.regions after
memblock_double_array(), due to now the memory.regions is pointing to a
memory region allocated by dummy_physical_memory_init(). And it will
affect the subsequent tests if we don't restore the memory region. So
simply record the origin region, and restore it after the test.

Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c    | 15 +++-
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h    |  4 ++
 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
index a13a57ba0815..b9877344d3a1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
@@ -423,6 +423,96 @@ static int memblock_add_near_max_check(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * A test that trying to add the 129th memory block.
+ * Expect to trigger memblock_double_array() to double the
+ * memblock.memory.max, find a new valid memory as
+ * memory.regions.
+ */
+static int memblock_add_many_check(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	void *orig_region;
+	struct region r = {
+		.base = SZ_16K,
+		.size = MEM_SIZE,
+	};
+	/* Record these allocated memory, they will be free at the end. */
+	phys_addr_t base[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1];
+
+	PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+	reset_memblock_regions();
+	memblock_allow_resize();
+
+	for (i = 0; i < INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; i++) {
+		/* Add some memory region to fulfill the memblock. */
+		dummy_physical_memory_init();
+		base[i] = dummy_physical_memory_base();
+		memblock_add(base[i], MEM_SIZE);
+
+		ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, i + 1);
+		ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (i + 1) * MEM_SIZE);
+	}
+
+	orig_region = memblock.memory.regions;
+
+	/*
+	 * This adds the 129 memory_region, and makes it double array. Now
+	 * MEM_SIZE is 16K, which is enough, the doubled array will occupy 8K
+	 * memory region, so it must success.
+	 */
+	dummy_physical_memory_init();
+	base[i] = dummy_physical_memory_base();
+	memblock_add(base[i], MEM_SIZE);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1) * MEM_SIZE);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
+	/* This is the size used by new memory.regions. Check it. */
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, PAGE_ALIGN(INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2 *
+						sizeof(struct memblock_region)));
+
+	/*
+	 * After double array, we want to make sure the memblock.memory.regions
+	 * is actually on a valid memory, so we try to add a memory region which
+	 * the base is very small, it should be insert to the first region. And
+	 * the memory.cnt and memory.total_size will both be changed.
+	 * Let's check it.
+	 */
+	memblock_add(r.base, r.size);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.regions[0].base, r.base);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.regions[0].size, r.size);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.total_size, (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2) * MEM_SIZE);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.max, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2);
+
+	/*
+	 * Due to we dummy_physical_memory_init() many memory region in this
+	 * test, we need to free it. Instead of expose the memory_block and
+	 * directly modify it's base, we pass an array which record all the
+	 * memory base that we allocated to this function, and let it to do the
+	 * clean job.
+	 */
+	dummy_physical_memory_cleanup_many(base, INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1);
+
+	/*
+	 * The current memory.regions is occupying a range of memory that
+	 * allocated from dummy_physical_memory_init(). After free the memory,
+	 * we must not use it. So restore the origin memory region to make sure
+	 * the tests can run as normal and not affected by the double array.
+	 */
+	memblock.memory.regions = orig_region;
+	memblock.memory.cnt = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
+
+	test_pass_pop();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int memblock_add_checks(void)
 {
 	prefix_reset();
@@ -438,6 +528,7 @@ static int memblock_add_checks(void)
 	memblock_add_twice_check();
 	memblock_add_between_check();
 	memblock_add_near_max_check();
+	memblock_add_many_check();
 
 	prefix_pop();
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
index eec6901081af..1fb347c5c099 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@
 #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
 #include <linux/build_bug.h>
 
-#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS			128
-#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS		INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS
 #define PREFIXES_MAX				15
 #define DELIM					": "
 
@@ -84,6 +82,19 @@ void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void)
 	free(memory_block.base);
 }
 
+void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup_many(phys_addr_t *base, int cnt)
+{
+	for (int i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
+		memory_block.base = (void *)base[i];
+		dummy_physical_memory_cleanup();
+	}
+}
+
+phys_addr_t dummy_physical_memory_base(void)
+{
+	return (phys_addr_t)memory_block.base;
+}
+
 static void usage(const char *prog)
 {
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(help_opts) != ARRAY_SIZE(long_opts) - 1);
diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
index 78128e109a95..310f0be2b2a2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 #include <../selftests/kselftest.h>
 
 #define MEM_SIZE SZ_16K
+#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS			128
+#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS		INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS
 
 enum test_flags {
 	/* No special request. */
@@ -104,6 +106,8 @@ void reset_memblock_attributes(void);
 void setup_memblock(void);
 void dummy_physical_memory_init(void);
 void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void);
+void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup_many(phys_addr_t *base, int cnt);
+phys_addr_t dummy_physical_memory_base(void);
 void parse_args(int argc, char **argv);
 
 void test_fail(void);
-- 
2.34.1



  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-02  2:39 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add tests trying to memblock_add() or memblock_reserve() 129th region shaoqin.huang
2022-09-02  2:39 ` shaoqin.huang [this message]
2022-09-06 12:57   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_add() " Mike Rapoport
2022-09-06 14:49     ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-09-02  2:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] memblock test: Add test to memblock_reserve() " shaoqin.huang
2022-09-02  2:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] memblock test: Update TODO list shaoqin.huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220902024007.58041-2-shaoqin.huang@intel.com \
    --to=shaoqin.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=karolinadrobnik@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=remckee0@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).