linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD SUCCESS WITH WARNING 76cf65d1377f733af1e2a55233e3353ffa577f54
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:52:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221025115214.26a12211@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1eccygLSjEoPdHV@shell.armlinux.org.uk>

On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:21:07 +0100 Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Not me, Sean. My original implementation of phylink_validate_mask_caps()
> doesn't know anything about rate matching, so my version didn't have
> this issue.
> 
> Sean's version of my patch (which is what was submitted) added the
> dereference that causes this, so, it's up to Sean to figure out a fix -
> but he reading his follow up to the build bot's message, he seems to
> be passing it over to me to fix!
> 
> I've got other issues to be worked on right now, and have no time to
> spare to fix other people's mistakes. Sorry.
> 
> You can't always rely on the apparent author mentioned in the commit to
> be the actual person responsible for the changes in a patch.

Eh, confusing authorship trail, sorry.

I'll send a patch to drop the if (), if it's really needed we'll hear
about it sooner or later.


      reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24 16:58 [linux-next:master] BUILD SUCCESS WITH WARNING 76cf65d1377f733af1e2a55233e3353ffa577f54 kernel test robot
2022-10-24 21:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-25  8:21   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-10-25 18:52     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221025115214.26a12211@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).