From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2686FC43217 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 18:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9402C8E0001; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:22:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8F0176B0073; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:22:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7DEC28E0001; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:22:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9E86B0071 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:22:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4D5A0F7A for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 18:22:46 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80096580732.26.5E26A64 Received: from mail-pf1-f170.google.com (mail-pf1-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C01140004 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 18:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f170.google.com with SMTP id m6so5248407pfb.0 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5kwrddbh0AjpQHJDtv4p1kwlSWL7OpMjxgVy9tJ3ZdE=; b=mediYFwUYG/2yUbilqGlldO/gRsGC6/mgEYuIhDe1Si39QjNc/trPYKiP1p9XhU8FS YC6GtGaQ7BTmWdx71ehDpLJFh9gH4TAS6wjDRpintwM7thIXMmpHNBa+YpPp7Sk910xG LjmbkmsEmGX5jCFZeb0bEhpFMYS1j5fKV131E= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5kwrddbh0AjpQHJDtv4p1kwlSWL7OpMjxgVy9tJ3ZdE=; b=3Jha/q+7n9CZLLhOFxLVGqxzmiv4Ufwf+JTS1gbTB4GuuwP05ujtS3LNSyEZfvtZWh aC9F1uaFRQ+CKR7iYkgzKlfcrHUWmDz9cJLPiK4Hn75/Rk+vd9sNwXFgalVW3Dn+ER3a gi+zSLTjAL0beKgxi5BYkQOK0ukqZhvdlRmCBgsVLQ/3/Mcxdi6tYN+9/nmr/EP9fjHw OYvHel4D49/0cjGIaNPe0GUuIa9v+9LMbn8xegAFd3CS4OF3Zw23zmWQYYNq/id9Q6yN SPmSWWnomUAqMIyq4xQk3qomeSrqI86skRWr/ZsDvsgEmLXxPbfKMA5T0C0Tr9gg6KIE ZGwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3GaK/gZUhdCrXg+JrgRu7N1hGqRLwsSwl/emagf+G8ZlxJfP30 /VUF6Ei9MGZYS9M3rkwxGNCx8w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4CO8L3McL6UsxwJau7ib17Hp7kzIQy7y4IuR8J7fZLkaa5SiTqyGOJadghOQ5ciylvf87g2g== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:81cc:0:b0:563:4e53:c08b with SMTP id c12-20020aa781cc000000b005634e53c08bmr36706082pfn.19.1667586163647; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7-20020aa79e47000000b0053e38ac0ff4sm3013789pfq.115.2022.11.04.11.22.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Nov 2022 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:22:42 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Roman Gushchin , linux-mm@kvack.org, David Gow , Rasmus Villemoes , Guenter Roeck , Andy Shevchenko , Paolo Abeni , Geert Uytterhoeven , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] slab: Provide functional __alloc_size() hints to kmalloc_trace*() Message-ID: <202211041121.2F1639D2@keescook> References: <20221101222520.never.109-kees@kernel.org> <20221101223321.1326815-3-keescook@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1667586164; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=5kwrddbh0AjpQHJDtv4p1kwlSWL7OpMjxgVy9tJ3ZdE=; b=bp6SdRQPTAzeB4/Ais+OPfzh+CiJmMdFWGol1vsTYPInKhwvter8aFbRCsuA6Lg2pb63pL ujIT+/DsBWiq5syC7078B0aijDeXtXxWhysbH7Zqjb/Fi0felvmRd1x4jXX/5f7dSAWI+a bqePauYHp8z0WdMVcF5V0nJ+x/QOzLw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=chromium.org header.s=google header.b=mediYFwU; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of keescook@chromium.org designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=keescook@chromium.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=chromium.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1667586164; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=3F0eAOVPA4/bNJRV1qDTCRkkoJKSpRJlNvGbgs0nP174R9AqFrOIaoGUTbh0D5jGNlZ9yv Bh5FxtpYqE+BfcK9PvVmA5k89ouoXIJDMtT345EFSlWJNvmN7FTSMXTaNtHE7RnE/1LbD1 HWbHPS/q7Y82bKx/WyLVyPfBY5kYKHw= X-Stat-Signature: d1qeyaik9z7xt1pzb75553axtba3i6b7 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C5C01140004 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=chromium.org header.s=google header.b=mediYFwU; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of keescook@chromium.org designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=keescook@chromium.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=chromium.org X-HE-Tag: 1667586164-248422 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 11:16:53PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:33:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > Since GCC cannot apply the __alloc_size attributes to inlines[1], all > > allocator inlines need to explicitly call into extern functions that > > contain a size argument. Provide these wrappers that end up just > > ignoring the size argument for the actual allocation. > > > > This allows CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y to see all various dynamic allocation > > sizes under GCC 12+ and all supported Clang versions. > > > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503 > > > > Cc: Vlastimil Babka > > Cc: Christoph Lameter > > Cc: Pekka Enberg > > Cc: David Rientjes > > Cc: Joonsoo Kim > > Cc: Andrew Morton > > Cc: Roman Gushchin > > Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> > > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > > --- > > include/linux/slab.h | 8 ++++++-- > > mm/slab_common.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h > > index 970e9504949e..051d86ca31a8 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/slab.h > > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h > > @@ -442,6 +442,8 @@ static_assert(PAGE_SHIFT <= 20); > > > > void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags) __assume_kmalloc_alignment __alloc_size(1); > > void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc; > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size) > > + __assume_slab_alignment __alloc_size(3); > > void *kmem_cache_alloc_lru(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru, > > gfp_t gfpflags) __assume_slab_alignment __malloc; > > void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *objp); > > @@ -469,6 +471,8 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_kmalloc_alignm > > __alloc_size(1); > > void *kmem_cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) __assume_slab_alignment > > __malloc; > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, size_t size) > > + __assume_slab_alignment __alloc_size(4); > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING > > void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size) > > @@ -482,7 +486,7 @@ void *kmalloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, > > static __always_inline __alloc_size(3) > > void *kmalloc_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size) > > { > > - void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags); > > + void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_sized(s, flags, size); > > > > ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, flags); > > return ret; > > @@ -492,7 +496,7 @@ static __always_inline __alloc_size(4) > > void *kmalloc_node_trace(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, > > int node, size_t size) > > { > > - void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node); > > + void *ret = kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(s, gfpflags, node, size); > > > > ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, gfpflags); > > return ret; > > diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c > > index 33b1886b06eb..5fa547539a6a 100644 > > --- a/mm/slab_common.c > > +++ b/mm/slab_common.c > > @@ -1457,6 +1457,20 @@ size_t ksize(const void *objp) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksize); > > > > +/* Wrapper so __alloc_size() can see the actual allocation size. */ > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size) > > +{ > > + return kmem_cache_alloc(s, flags); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc_sized); > > + > > +/* Wrapper so __alloc_size() can see the actual allocation size. */ > > +void *kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, size_t size) > > +{ > > + return kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, flags, node); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc_node_sized); > > The reason that we have two implementations of kmalloc_trace* > depending on CONFIG_TRACING is to save additional function call when > CONFIG_TRACING is not set. > > With this patch there is no reason to keep both. > So let's drop #ifdefs and use single implementation in mm/slab_common.c. Okay, I'll respin... -- Kees Cook