From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Document huge_pte_offset usage
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:35:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221129193526.3588187-4-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129193526.3588187-1-peterx@redhat.com>
huge_pte_offset() is potentially a pgtable walker, looking up pte_t* for a
hugetlb address.
Normally, it's always safe to walk a generic pgtable as long as we're with
the mmap lock held for either read or write, because that guarantees the
pgtable pages will always be valid during the process.
But it's not true for hugetlbfs, especially shared: hugetlbfs can have its
pgtable freed by pmd unsharing, it means that even with mmap lock held for
current mm, the PMD pgtable page can still go away from under us if pmd
unsharing is possible during the walk.
So we have two ways to make it safe even for a shared mapping:
(1) If we're with the hugetlb vma lock held for either read/write, it's
okay because pmd unshare cannot happen at all.
(2) If we're with the i_mmap_rwsem lock held for either read/write, it's
okay because even if pmd unshare can happen, the pgtable page cannot
be freed from under us.
Document it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
index 551834cd5299..81efd9b9baa2 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -192,6 +192,38 @@ extern struct list_head huge_boot_pages;
pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long sz);
+/*
+ * huge_pte_offset(): Walk the hugetlb pgtable until the last level PTE.
+ * Returns the pte_t* if found, or NULL if the address is not mapped.
+ *
+ * Since this function will walk all the pgtable pages (including not only
+ * high-level pgtable page, but also PUD entry that can be unshared
+ * concurrently for VM_SHARED), the caller of this function should be
+ * responsible of its thread safety. One can follow this rule:
+ *
+ * (1) For private mappings: pmd unsharing is not possible, so it'll
+ * always be safe if we're with the mmap sem for either read or write.
+ * This is normally always the case, IOW we don't need to do anything
+ * special.
+ *
+ * (2) For shared mappings: pmd unsharing is possible (so the PUD-ranged
+ * pgtable page can go away from under us! It can be done by a pmd
+ * unshare with a follow up munmap() on the other process), then we
+ * need either:
+ *
+ * (2.1) hugetlb vma lock read or write held, to make sure pmd unshare
+ * won't happen upon the range (it also makes sure the pte_t we
+ * read is the right and stable one), or,
+ *
+ * (2.2) hugetlb mapping i_mmap_rwsem lock held read or write, to make
+ * sure even if unshare happened the racy unmap() will wait until
+ * i_mmap_rwsem is released.
+ *
+ * Option (2.1) is the safest, which guarantees pte stability from pmd
+ * sharing pov, until the vma lock released. Option (2.2) doesn't protect
+ * a concurrent pmd unshare, but it makes sure the pgtable page is safe to
+ * access.
+ */
pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long sz);
unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h);
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 19:35 [PATCH 00/10] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() thread-safe for pmd unshare Peter Xu
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm/hugetlb: Let vma_offset_start() to return start Peter Xu
2022-11-30 10:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm/hugetlb: Don't wait for migration entry during follow page Peter Xu
2022-11-30 4:37 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-11-30 10:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-29 19:35 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-11-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Document huge_pte_offset usage Mike Kravetz
2022-11-30 15:58 ` Peter Xu
2022-12-05 21:47 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-11-30 10:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-30 10:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-30 16:09 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-30 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-30 16:25 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-30 16:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm/hugetlb: Move swap entry handling into vma lock when faulted Peter Xu
2022-12-05 22:14 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-12-05 23:36 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm/hugetlb: Make userfaultfd_huge_must_wait() safe to pmd unshare Peter Xu
2022-11-30 16:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-12-05 22:23 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm/hugetlb: Make hugetlb_follow_page_mask() " Peter Xu
2022-11-30 16:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-12-05 22:29 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm/hugetlb: Make follow_hugetlb_page() " Peter Xu
2022-11-30 16:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-12-05 22:45 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm/hugetlb: Make walk_hugetlb_range() " Peter Xu
2022-11-30 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-12-05 23:33 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-12-05 23:52 ` John Hubbard
2022-12-06 16:45 ` Peter Xu
2022-12-06 18:50 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-12-06 21:03 ` John Hubbard
2022-12-06 21:51 ` Peter Xu
2022-12-06 22:31 ` John Hubbard
2022-12-07 0:07 ` Peter Xu
2022-12-07 2:38 ` John Hubbard
2022-12-07 14:58 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm/hugetlb: Make page_vma_mapped_walk() " Peter Xu
2022-11-30 16:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-30 16:32 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-30 16:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-12-05 23:52 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-12-06 17:10 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-12-06 17:39 ` Peter Xu
2022-12-06 17:43 ` Peter Xu
2022-12-06 19:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm/hugetlb: Introduce hugetlb_walk() Peter Xu
2022-11-30 5:18 ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-30 15:37 ` Peter Xu
2022-12-06 0:21 ` Mike Kravetz
2022-11-29 20:49 ` [PATCH 00/10] mm/hugetlb: Make huge_pte_offset() thread-safe for pmd unshare Andrew Morton
2022-11-29 21:19 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-29 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2022-11-29 20:51 ` Andrew Morton
2022-11-29 21:36 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-30 9:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-30 16:23 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221129193526.3588187-4-peterx@redhat.com \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).