From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>,
kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org,
jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com,
christina.schimpe@intel.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 33/41] x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:03:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230223000340.GB945966@debug.ba.rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230218211433.26859-34-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 01:14:25PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
>When operating with shadow stacks enabled, the kernel will automatically
>allocate shadow stacks for new threads, however in some cases userspace
>will need additional shadow stacks. The main example of this is the
>ucontext family of functions, which require userspace allocating and
>pivoting to userspace managed stacks.
>
>Unlike most other user memory permissions, shadow stacks need to be
>provisioned with special data in order to be useful. They need to be setup
>with a restore token so that userspace can pivot to them via the RSTORSSP
>instruction. But, the security design of shadow stack's is that they
>should not be written to except in limited circumstances. This presents a
>problem for userspace, as to how userspace can provision this special
>data, without allowing for the shadow stack to be generally writable.
>
>Previously, a new PROT_SHADOW_STACK was attempted, which could be
>mprotect()ed from RW permissions after the data was provisioned. This was
>found to not be secure enough, as other thread's could write to the
>shadow stack during the writable window.
>
>The kernel can use a special instruction, WRUSS, to write directly to
>userspace shadow stacks. So the solution can be that memory can be mapped
>as shadow stack permissions from the beginning (never generally writable
>in userspace), and the kernel itself can write the restore token.
>
>First, a new madvise() flag was explored, which could operate on the
>PROT_SHADOW_STACK memory. This had a couple downsides:
>1. Extra checks were needed in mprotect() to prevent writable memory from
> ever becoming PROT_SHADOW_STACK.
>2. Extra checks/vma state were needed in the new madvise() to prevent
> restore tokens being written into the middle of pre-used shadow stacks.
> It is ideal to prevent restore tokens being added at arbitrary
> locations, so the check was to make sure the shadow stack had never been
> written to.
>3. It stood out from the rest of the madvise flags, as more of direct
> action than a hint at future desired behavior.
>
>So rather than repurpose two existing syscalls (mmap, madvise) that don't
>quite fit, just implement a new map_shadow_stack syscall to allow
>userspace to map and setup new shadow stacks in one step. While ucontext
>is the primary motivator, userspace may have other unforeseen reasons to
>setup it's own shadow stacks using the WRSS instruction. Towards this
>provide a flag so that stacks can be optionally setup securely for the
>common case of ucontext without enabling WRSS. Or potentially have the
>kernel set up the shadow stack in some new way.
Was following ever attempted?
void *shstk = mmap(0, size, PROT_SHADOWSTACK, ...);
- limit PROT_SHADOWSTACK protection flag to only mmap (and thus mprotect can't
convert memory from shadow stack to non-shadow stack type or vice versa)
- limit PROT_SHADOWSTACK protection flag to anonymous memory only.
- top level mmap handler to put a token at the base using WRUSS if prot == PROT_SHADOWSTACK
You essentially would get shadow stack manufacturing with existing (single) syscall.
Acting a bit selfish here, this allows other architectures as well to re-use this and
do their own implementation of mapping and placing the token at the base.
>
>The following example demonstrates how to create a new shadow stack with
>map_shadow_stack:
>void *shstk = map_shadow_stack(addr, stack_size, SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN);
>
>Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
>Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>
>Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
>
>---
>v5:
> - Fix addr/mapped_addr (Kees)
> - Switch to EOPNOTSUPP (Kees suggested ENOTSUPP, but checkpatch
> suggests this)
> - Return error for addresses below 4G
>
>v3:
> - Change syscall common -> 64 (Kees)
> - Use bit shift notation instead of 0x1 for uapi header (Kees)
> - Call do_mmap() with MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE (Kees)
> - Block unsupported flags (Kees)
> - Require size >= 8 to set token (Kees)
>
>v2:
> - Change syscall to take address like mmap() for CRIU's usage
>
>v1:
> - New patch (replaces PROT_SHADOW_STACK).
>---
> arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 2 +-
> kernel/sys_ni.c | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
>index c84d12608cd2..f65c671ce3b1 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
>+++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
>@@ -372,6 +372,7 @@
> 448 common process_mrelease sys_process_mrelease
> 449 common futex_waitv sys_futex_waitv
> 450 common set_mempolicy_home_node sys_set_mempolicy_home_node
>+451 64 map_shadow_stack sys_map_shadow_stack
>
> #
> # Due to a historical design error, certain syscalls are numbered differently
>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
>index 5a0256e73f1e..8148bdddbd2c 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
>@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
> ((key) & 0x8 ? VM_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
> #endif
>
>+/* Flags for map_shadow_stack(2) */
>+#define SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN (1ULL << 0) /* Set up a restore token in the shadow stack */
>+
> #include <asm-generic/mman.h>
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_MMAN_H */
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
>index 40f0a55762a9..0a3decab70ee 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/shstk.c
>@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> #include <linux/user.h>
>+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
> #include <asm/msr.h>
> #include <asm/fpu/xstate.h>
> #include <asm/fpu/types.h>
>@@ -71,19 +72,31 @@ static int create_rstor_token(unsigned long ssp, unsigned long *token_addr)
> return 0;
> }
>
>-static unsigned long alloc_shstk(unsigned long size)
>+static unsigned long alloc_shstk(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
>+ unsigned long token_offset, bool set_res_tok)
> {
> int flags = MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ABOVE4G;
> struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>- unsigned long addr, unused;
>+ unsigned long mapped_addr, unused;
>
>- mmap_write_lock(mm);
>- addr = do_mmap(NULL, 0, size, PROT_READ, flags,
>- VM_SHADOW_STACK | VM_WRITE, 0, &unused, NULL);
>+ if (addr)
>+ flags |= MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE;
>
>+ mmap_write_lock(mm);
>+ mapped_addr = do_mmap(NULL, addr, size, PROT_READ, flags,
>+ VM_SHADOW_STACK | VM_WRITE, 0, &unused, NULL);
> mmap_write_unlock(mm);
>
>- return addr;
>+ if (!set_res_tok || IS_ERR_VALUE(mapped_addr))
>+ goto out;
>+
>+ if (create_rstor_token(mapped_addr + token_offset, NULL)) {
>+ vm_munmap(mapped_addr, size);
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ }
>+
>+out:
>+ return mapped_addr;
> }
>
> static unsigned long adjust_shstk_size(unsigned long size)
>@@ -134,7 +147,7 @@ static int shstk_setup(void)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> size = adjust_shstk_size(0);
>- addr = alloc_shstk(size);
>+ addr = alloc_shstk(0, size, 0, false);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
>
>@@ -178,7 +191,7 @@ int shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long clone_flags,
> return 0;
>
> size = adjust_shstk_size(stack_size);
>- addr = alloc_shstk(size);
>+ addr = alloc_shstk(0, size, 0, false);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
>
>@@ -371,6 +384,36 @@ static int shstk_disable(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
>+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
>+{
>+ bool set_tok = flags & SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN;
>+ unsigned long aligned_size;
>+
>+ if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_USER_SHSTK))
>+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+
>+ if (flags & ~SHADOW_STACK_SET_TOKEN)
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+
>+ /* If there isn't space for a token */
>+ if (set_tok && size < 8)
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+
>+ if (addr && addr <= 0xFFFFFFFF)
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+
>+ /*
>+ * An overflow would result in attempting to write the restore token
>+ * to the wrong location. Not catastrophic, but just return the right
>+ * error code and block it.
>+ */
>+ aligned_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
>+ if (aligned_size < size)
>+ return -EOVERFLOW;
>+
>+ return alloc_shstk(addr, aligned_size, size, set_tok);
>+}
>+
> long shstk_prctl(struct task_struct *task, int option, unsigned long features)
> {
> if (option == ARCH_SHSTK_LOCK) {
>diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
>index 33a0ee3bcb2e..392dc11e3556 100644
>--- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
>+++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
>@@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_memfd_secret(unsigned int flags);
> asmlinkage long sys_set_mempolicy_home_node(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long home_node,
> unsigned long flags);
>+asmlinkage long sys_map_shadow_stack(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, unsigned int flags);
>
> /*
> * Architecture-specific system calls
>diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>index 45fa180cc56a..b12940ec5926 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_futex_waitv, sys_futex_waitv)
> __SYSCALL(__NR_set_mempolicy_home_node, sys_set_mempolicy_home_node)
>
> #undef __NR_syscalls
>-#define __NR_syscalls 451
>+#define __NR_syscalls 452
>
> /*
> * 32 bit systems traditionally used different
>diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c
>index 860b2dcf3ac4..cb9aebd34646 100644
>--- a/kernel/sys_ni.c
>+++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c
>@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ COND_SYSCALL(vm86old);
> COND_SYSCALL(modify_ldt);
> COND_SYSCALL(vm86);
> COND_SYSCALL(kexec_file_load);
>+COND_SYSCALL(map_shadow_stack);
>
> /* s390 */
> COND_SYSCALL(s390_pci_mmio_read);
>--
>2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-23 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-18 21:13 [PATCH v6 00/41] Shadow stacks for userspace Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/41] Documentation/x86: Add CET shadow stack description Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/41] x86/shstk: Add Kconfig option for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/41] x86/cpufeatures: Add CPU feature flags for shadow stacks Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 04/41] x86/cpufeatures: Enable CET CR4 bit for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/41] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce CET MSR and XSAVES supervisor states Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/41] x86/fpu: Add helper for modifying xstate Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/41] x86: Move control protection handler to separate file Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 08/41] x86/shstk: Add user control-protection fault handler Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 09/41] x86/mm: Remove _PAGE_DIRTY from kernel RO pages Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 10/41] x86/mm: Move pmd_write(), pud_write() up in the file Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 11/41] mm: Introduce pte_mkwrite_kernel() Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-19 20:38 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-20 11:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-20 11:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-01 15:39 ` Deepak Gupta
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 12/41] s390/mm: Introduce pmd_mkwrite_kernel() Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-19 20:39 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-20 11:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-23 12:14 ` Heiko Carstens
2023-02-23 17:59 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 13/41] mm: Make pte_mkwrite() take a VMA Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-19 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-20 1:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-02-20 21:24 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-20 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-20 22:56 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-03-01 15:41 ` Deepak Gupta
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 14/41] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_SAVED_DIRTY Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-20 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-20 21:38 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-21 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-21 20:08 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-21 20:13 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-22 1:02 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-22 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-22 17:23 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-22 17:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-22 17:42 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-22 17:54 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-22 19:39 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 15/41] x86/mm: Update ptep/pmdp_set_wrprotect() for _PAGE_SAVED_DIRTY Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 16/41] x86/mm: Start actually marking _PAGE_SAVED_DIRTY Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 17/41] mm: Move VM_UFFD_MINOR_BIT from 37 to 38 Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 18/41] mm: Introduce VM_SHADOW_STACK for shadow stack memory Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-20 12:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-20 22:08 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-21 8:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-22 22:13 ` Deepak Gupta
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 19/41] x86/mm: Check shadow stack page fault errors Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-20 12:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-22 23:07 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-23 12:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 20/41] x86/mm: Teach pte_mkwrite() about stack memory Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-19 20:41 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-20 22:52 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-03-01 15:42 ` Deepak Gupta
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 21/41] mm: Add guard pages around a shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 22/41] mm/mmap: Add shadow stack pages to memory accounting Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-20 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-20 22:44 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-21 8:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-22 0:06 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 23/41] mm: Re-introduce vm_flags to do_mmap() Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 24/41] mm: Don't allow write GUPs to shadow stack memory Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-21 8:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-21 20:02 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 25/41] x86/mm: Introduce MAP_ABOVE4G Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-19 20:43 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-20 22:38 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 26/41] mm: Warn on shadow stack memory in wrong vma Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 27/41] x86/mm: Warn if create Write=0,Dirty=1 with raw prot Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-19 20:45 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-20 22:32 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 28/41] x86: Introduce userspace API for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-24 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-24 18:37 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-28 10:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-28 22:35 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 29/41] x86/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-24 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-24 18:25 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-24 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 30/41] x86/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 31/41] x86/shstk: Introduce routines modifying shstk Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 32/41] x86/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 33/41] x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-23 0:03 ` Deepak Gupta [this message]
2023-02-23 1:11 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-23 21:20 ` Deepak Gupta
2023-02-23 23:42 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 34/41] x86/shstk: Support WRSS for userspace Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 35/41] x86: Expose thread features in /proc/$PID/status Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 36/41] x86/shstk: Wire in shadow stack interface Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 37/41] selftests/x86: Add shadow stack test Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-19 20:47 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-21 8:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-02-21 20:02 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-23 13:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-23 17:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-24 11:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-24 18:39 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 38/41] x86/fpu: Add helper for initing features Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-19 20:48 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 39/41] x86: Add PTRACE interface for shadow stack Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 40/41] x86/shstk: Add ARCH_SHSTK_UNLOCK Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-18 21:14 ` [PATCH v6 41/41] x86/shstk: Add ARCH_SHSTK_STATUS Rick Edgecombe
2023-02-20 3:42 ` [PATCH v6 00/41] Shadow stacks for userspace Kees Cook
2023-02-20 22:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-20 6:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-02-20 21:23 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-02-20 20:22 ` John Allen
2023-02-21 2:38 ` Pengfei Xu
2023-02-22 19:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-22 19:31 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230223000340.GB945966@debug.ba.rivosinc.com \
--to=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=christina.schimpe@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dethoma@microsoft.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).