From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv1][WIP] ext2: Move direct-io to use iomap
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 18:51:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230320175139.l5oqbwuae4schgcu@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eae9d2125de1887f55186668937df7475b0a33f4.1678977084.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
On Thu 16-03-23 20:10:29, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> [DO NOT MERGE] [WORK-IN-PROGRESS]
>
> Hello Jan,
>
> This is an initial version of the patch set which I wanted to share
> before today's call. This is still work in progress but atleast passes
> the set of test cases which I had kept for dio testing (except 1 from my
> list).
>
> Looks like there won't be much/any changes required from iomap side to
> support ext2 moving to iomap apis.
>
> I will be doing some more testing specifically test generic/083 which is
> occassionally failing in my testing.
> Also once this is stabilized, I can do some performance testing too if you
> feel so. Last I remembered we saw some performance regressions when ext4
> moved to iomap for dio.
>
> PS: Please ignore if there are some silly mistakes. As I said, I wanted
> to get this out before today's discussion. :)
>
> Thanks for your help!!
>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ext2/ext2.h | 1 +
> fs/ext2/file.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/ext2/inode.c | 20 +--------
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/ext2.h b/fs/ext2/ext2.h
> index cb78d7dcfb95..cb5e309fe040 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/ext2.h
> +++ b/fs/ext2/ext2.h
> @@ -753,6 +753,7 @@ extern unsigned long ext2_count_free (struct buffer_head *, unsigned);
> extern struct inode *ext2_iget (struct super_block *, unsigned long);
> extern int ext2_write_inode (struct inode *, struct writeback_control *);
> extern void ext2_evict_inode(struct inode *);
> +extern void ext2_write_failed(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t to);
> extern int ext2_get_block(struct inode *, sector_t, struct buffer_head *, int);
> extern int ext2_setattr (struct mnt_idmap *, struct dentry *, struct iattr *);
> extern int ext2_getattr (struct mnt_idmap *, const struct path *,
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/file.c b/fs/ext2/file.c
> index 6b4bebe982ca..7a8561304559 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/file.c
> @@ -161,12 +161,123 @@ int ext2_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static ssize_t ext2_dio_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> +{
> + struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> + struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + inode_lock_shared(inode);
> + ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, to, &ext2_iomap_ops, NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
> + inode_unlock_shared(inode);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ext2_dio_write_end_io(struct kiocb *iocb, ssize_t size,
> + int error, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
> +
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
I guess you should carry over here relevant bits of the comment from
ext4_dio_write_end_io() explaining that doing i_size update here is
necessary and actually safe.
> + pos += size;
> + if (pos > i_size_read(inode))
> + i_size_write(inode, pos);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iomap_dio_ops ext2_dio_write_ops = {
> + .end_io = ext2_dio_write_end_io,
> +};
> +
> +static ssize_t ext2_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> +{
> + struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> + struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> + ssize_t ret;
> + unsigned int flags;
> + unsigned long blocksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
> + loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
> + loff_t count = iov_iter_count(from);
> +
> +
> + inode_lock(inode);
> + ret = generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
> + if (ret <= 0)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + ret = file_remove_privs(file);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + ret = file_update_time(file);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + /*
> + * We pass IOMAP_DIO_NOSYNC because otherwise iomap_dio_rw()
> + * calls for generic_write_sync in iomap_dio_complete().
> + * Since ext2_fsync nmust be called w/o inode lock,
> + * hence we pass IOMAP_DIO_NOSYNC and handle generic_write_sync()
> + * ourselves.
> + */
> + flags = IOMAP_DIO_NOSYNC;
Meh, this is kind of ugly and we should come up with something better for
simple filesystems so that they don't have to play these games. Frankly,
these days I doubt there's anybody really needing inode_lock in
__generic_file_fsync(). Neither sync_mapping_buffers() nor
sync_inode_metadata() need inode_lock for their self-consistency. So it is
only about flushing more consistent set of metadata to disk when fsync(2)
races with other write(2)s to the same file so after a crash we have higher
chances of seeing some real state of the file. But I'm not sure it's really
worth keeping for filesystems that are still using sync_mapping_buffers().
People that care about consistency after a crash have IMHO moved to other
filesystems long ago.
> +
> + /* use IOMAP_DIO_FORCE_WAIT for unaligned of extending writes */
^^ or
> + if (iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from) > i_size_read(inode) ||
> + (!IS_ALIGNED(iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_alignment(from), blocksize)))
> + flags |= IOMAP_DIO_FORCE_WAIT;
> +
> + ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, from, &ext2_iomap_ops, &ext2_dio_write_ops,
> + flags, NULL, 0);
> +
> + if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
> + ret = 0;
So iomap_dio_rw() doesn't have the DIO_SKIP_HOLES behavior of
blockdev_direct_IO(). Thus you have to implement that in your
ext2_iomap_ops, in particular in iomap_begin...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-20 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-29 4:46 LSF/MM/BPF 2023 IOMAP conversion status update Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-29 5:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-29 5:39 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-08 16:04 ` Jan Kara
2023-02-24 7:01 ` Zhang Yi
2023-02-26 20:16 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-16 14:40 ` [RFCv1][WIP] ext2: Move direct-io to use iomap Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-03-16 15:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-03-20 16:11 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-20 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-20 17:51 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2023-03-22 6:34 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-23 11:30 ` Jan Kara
2023-03-23 13:19 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-30 0:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-02-27 19:26 ` LSF/MM/BPF 2023 IOMAP conversion status update Darrick J. Wong
2023-02-27 21:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-27 19:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-02-27 20:24 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-27 19:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-02-27 19:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-01 16:59 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-01 17:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230320175139.l5oqbwuae4schgcu@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).