linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@fromorbit.com, tkhai@ya.ru,
	vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, djwong@kernel.org,
	brauner@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/29] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:39:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622083932.4090339-13-qi.zheng@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622083932.4090339-1-qi.zheng@linux.dev>

From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink,
we need to dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker,
so that it can be freed asynchronously using kfree_rcu().
Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side critical
section when releasing the struct mb_cache.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 fs/mbcache.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index 2a4b8b549e93..fec393e55a66 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct mb_cache {
 	struct list_head	c_list;
 	/* Number of entries in cache */
 	unsigned long		c_entry_count;
-	struct shrinker		c_shrink;
+	struct shrinker		*c_shrink;
 	/* Work for shrinking when the cache has too many entries */
 	struct work_struct	c_shrink_work;
 };
@@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mb_cache_entry_touch);
 static unsigned long mb_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				    struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct mb_cache *cache = container_of(shrink, struct mb_cache,
-					      c_shrink);
+	struct mb_cache *cache = shrink->private_data;
 
 	return cache->c_entry_count;
 }
@@ -333,8 +332,8 @@ static unsigned long mb_cache_shrink(struct mb_cache *cache,
 static unsigned long mb_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				   struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct mb_cache *cache = container_of(shrink, struct mb_cache,
-					      c_shrink);
+	struct mb_cache *cache = shrink->private_data;
+
 	return mb_cache_shrink(cache, sc->nr_to_scan);
 }
 
@@ -370,26 +369,30 @@ struct mb_cache *mb_cache_create(int bucket_bits)
 	cache->c_hash = kmalloc_array(bucket_count,
 				      sizeof(struct hlist_bl_head),
 				      GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!cache->c_hash) {
-		kfree(cache);
-		goto err_out;
-	}
+	if (!cache->c_hash)
+		goto err_c_hash;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < bucket_count; i++)
 		INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD(&cache->c_hash[i]);
 
-	cache->c_shrink.count_objects = mb_cache_count;
-	cache->c_shrink.scan_objects = mb_cache_scan;
-	cache->c_shrink.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	if (register_shrinker(&cache->c_shrink, "mbcache-shrinker")) {
-		kfree(cache->c_hash);
-		kfree(cache);
-		goto err_out;
-	}
+	cache->c_shrink = shrinker_alloc_and_init(mb_cache_count, mb_cache_scan,
+						  0, DEFAULT_SEEKS, 0, cache);
+	if (!cache->c_shrink)
+		goto err_shrinker;
+
+	if (register_shrinker(cache->c_shrink, "mbcache-shrinker"))
+		goto err_register;
 
 	INIT_WORK(&cache->c_shrink_work, mb_cache_shrink_worker);
 
 	return cache;
 
+err_register:
+	shrinker_free(cache->c_shrink);
+err_shrinker:
+	kfree(cache->c_hash);
+err_c_hash:
+	kfree(cache);
 err_out:
 	return NULL;
 }
@@ -406,7 +409,7 @@ void mb_cache_destroy(struct mb_cache *cache)
 {
 	struct mb_cache_entry *entry, *next;
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&cache->c_shrink);
+	unregister_and_free_shrinker(cache->c_shrink);
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't bother with any locking. Cache must not be used at this
-- 
2.30.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-22  8:39 [PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 01/29] mm: shrinker: add shrinker::private_data field Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 02/29] mm: vmscan: introduce some helpers for dynamically allocating shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 03/29] drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 04/29] drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 05/29] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 10:01   ` Steven Price
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 06/29] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 07/29] dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 08/29] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 09/29] bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 10/29] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 11/29] virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 13/29] ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 14/29] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker Qi Zheng
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-22  8:53 [PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:53 ` [PATCH 12/29] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker Qi Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230622083932.4090339-13-qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).