linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@fromorbit.com, tkhai@ya.ru,
	vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, djwong@kernel.org,
	brauner@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/29] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:39:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622083932.4090339-7-qi.zheng@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622083932.4090339-1-qi.zheng@linux.dev>

From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink,
we need to dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker,
so that it can be freed asynchronously using kfree_rcu().
Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side critical
section when releasing the struct dm_bufio_client.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
index eea977662e81..9472470d456d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ struct dm_bufio_client {
 
 	sector_t start;
 
-	struct shrinker shrinker;
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 	struct work_struct shrink_work;
 	atomic_long_t need_shrink;
 
@@ -2385,7 +2385,7 @@ static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink
 {
 	struct dm_bufio_client *c;
 
-	c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
+	c = shrink->private_data;
 	atomic_long_add(sc->nr_to_scan, &c->need_shrink);
 	queue_work(dm_bufio_wq, &c->shrink_work);
 
@@ -2394,7 +2394,7 @@ static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink
 
 static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct dm_bufio_client *c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
+	struct dm_bufio_client *c = shrink->private_data;
 	unsigned long count = cache_total(&c->cache);
 	unsigned long retain_target = get_retain_buffers(c);
 	unsigned long queued_for_cleanup = atomic_long_read(&c->need_shrink);
@@ -2507,14 +2507,15 @@ struct dm_bufio_client *dm_bufio_client_create(struct block_device *bdev, unsign
 	INIT_WORK(&c->shrink_work, shrink_work);
 	atomic_long_set(&c->need_shrink, 0);
 
-	c->shrinker.count_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_count;
-	c->shrinker.scan_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_scan;
-	c->shrinker.seeks = 1;
-	c->shrinker.batch = 0;
-	r = register_shrinker(&c->shrinker, "dm-bufio:(%u:%u)",
+	c->shrinker = shrinker_alloc_and_init(dm_bufio_shrink_count,
+					      dm_bufio_shrink_scan, 0, 1, 0, c);
+	if (!c->shrinker)
+		goto bad;
+
+	r = register_shrinker(c->shrinker, "dm-bufio:(%u:%u)",
 			      MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev), MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
 	if (r)
-		goto bad;
+		goto bad_shrinker;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
 	dm_bufio_client_count++;
@@ -2524,6 +2525,8 @@ struct dm_bufio_client *dm_bufio_client_create(struct block_device *bdev, unsign
 
 	return c;
 
+bad_shrinker:
+	shrinker_free(c->shrinker);
 bad:
 	while (!list_empty(&c->reserved_buffers)) {
 		struct dm_buffer *b = list_to_buffer(c->reserved_buffers.next);
@@ -2554,7 +2557,7 @@ void dm_bufio_client_destroy(struct dm_bufio_client *c)
 
 	drop_buffers(c);
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&c->shrinker);
+	unregister_and_free_shrinker(c->shrinker);
 	flush_work(&c->shrink_work);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
-- 
2.30.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-22  8:39 [PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 01/29] mm: shrinker: add shrinker::private_data field Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 02/29] mm: vmscan: introduce some helpers for dynamically allocating shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 03/29] drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 04/29] drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 05/29] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-23 10:01   ` Steven Price
2023-06-22  8:39 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 07/29] dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 08/29] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 09/29] bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 10/29] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 11/29] virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 12/29] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 13/29] ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:39 ` [PATCH 14/29] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker Qi Zheng
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-22  8:53 [PATCH 00/29] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
2023-06-22  8:53 ` [PATCH 06/29] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker Qi Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230622083932.4090339-7-qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).