* [PATCH RESEND] binfmt_elf: fix comment typo s/reset/regset/
@ 2023-06-23 5:56 Baruch Siach
2023-06-23 16:38 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2023-06-23 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Biederman, Kees Cook; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Baruch Siach
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
Resending with LKML in Cc. kvack.org MX does not like our mail server.
---
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git fs/binfmt_elf.c fs/binfmt_elf.c
index 8a884e795f6a..f304a3434c5a 100644
--- fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ static int fill_thread_core_info(struct elf_thread_core_info *t,
/*
* NT_PRSTATUS is the one special case, because the regset data
* goes into the pr_reg field inside the note contents, rather
- * than being the whole note contents. We fill the reset in here.
+ * than being the whole note contents. We fill the regset in here.
* We assume that regset 0 is NT_PRSTATUS.
*/
fill_prstatus(&t->prstatus.common, t->task, signr);
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] binfmt_elf: fix comment typo s/reset/regset/
2023-06-23 5:56 [PATCH RESEND] binfmt_elf: fix comment typo s/reset/regset/ Baruch Siach
@ 2023-06-23 16:38 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2023-06-23 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baruch Siach; +Cc: Eric Biederman, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 08:56:44AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
> ---
>
> Resending with LKML in Cc. kvack.org MX does not like our mail server.
> ---
> fs/binfmt_elf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git fs/binfmt_elf.c fs/binfmt_elf.c
> index 8a884e795f6a..f304a3434c5a 100644
> --- fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ fs/binfmt_elf.c
Same formatting issue with this one.
> @@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ static int fill_thread_core_info(struct elf_thread_core_info *t,
> /*
> * NT_PRSTATUS is the one special case, because the regset data
> * goes into the pr_reg field inside the note contents, rather
> - * than being the whole note contents. We fill the reset in here.
> + * than being the whole note contents. We fill the regset in here.
> * We assume that regset 0 is NT_PRSTATUS.
> */
> fill_prstatus(&t->prstatus.common, t->task, signr);
But thank you; I've applied both to the execve tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/execve
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-23 16:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-23 5:56 [PATCH RESEND] binfmt_elf: fix comment typo s/reset/regset/ Baruch Siach
2023-06-23 16:38 ` Kees Cook
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).