* [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix unitialized memory error from
@ 2023-07-29 20:37 SeongJae Park
2023-07-29 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core: initialize damo_filter->list from damos_new_filter() SeongJae Park
2023-07-29 20:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/core-test: add a test for damos_new_filter() SeongJae Park
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2023-07-29 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: SeongJae Park, Brendan Higgins, damon, linux-mm, linux-kselftest,
kunit-dev, stable, linux-kernel
damos_new_filter() is returning a damos_filter struct without
initializing its ->list field. And the users of the function uses the
struct without initializing the field. As a result, uninitialized
memory access error is possible. Actually, a kernel NULL pointer
dereference BUG can be triggered using DAMON user-space tool, like
below.
# damo start --damos_action stat --damos_filter anon matching
# damo tune --damos_action stat --damos_filter anon matching --damos_filter anon nomatching
# dmesg
[...]
[ 36.908136] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
[ 36.910483] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
[ 36.912238] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
[ 36.913415] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 36.913978] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[ 36.914878] CPU: 32 PID: 1335 Comm: kdamond.0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3-mm-unstable-damon+ #1
[ 36.916621] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 36.919051] RIP: 0010:damos_destroy_filter (include/linux/list.h:114 include/linux/list.h:137 include/linux/list.h:148 mm/damon/core.c:345 mm/damon/core.c:355)
[...]
[ 36.938247] Call Trace:
[ 36.938721] <TASK>
[...]
[ 36.950064] ? damos_destroy_filter (include/linux/list.h:114 include/linux/list.h:137 include/linux/list.h:148 mm/damon/core.c:345 mm/damon/core.c:355)
[ 36.950883] ? damon_sysfs_set_scheme_filters.isra.0 (mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:1573)
[ 36.952019] damon_sysfs_set_schemes (mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:1674 mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c:1686)
[ 36.952875] damon_sysfs_apply_inputs (mm/damon/sysfs.c:1312 mm/damon/sysfs.c:1298)
[ 36.953757] ? damon_pa_check_accesses (mm/damon/paddr.c:168 mm/damon/paddr.c:179)
[ 36.954648] damon_sysfs_cmd_request_callback (mm/damon/sysfs.c:1329 mm/damon/sysfs.c:1359)
[...]
The first patch of this patchset fixes the bug by initializing the field in
damos_new_filter(). The second patch adds a unit test for the problem.
Note that the second patch Cc stable@ without Fixes: tag, since it would
be better to be ingested together for avoiding any future regression.
SeongJae Park (2):
mm/damon/core: initialize damo_filter->list from damos_new_filter()
mm/damon/core-test: add a test for damos_new_filter()
mm/damon/core-test.h | 13 +++++++++++++
mm/damon/core.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core: initialize damo_filter->list from damos_new_filter()
2023-07-29 20:37 [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix unitialized memory error from SeongJae Park
@ 2023-07-29 20:37 ` SeongJae Park
2023-07-29 20:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/core-test: add a test for damos_new_filter() SeongJae Park
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2023-07-29 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: SeongJae Park, damon, linux-mm, stable, linux-kernel
damos_new_filter() is not initializing the list field of newly allocated
filter object. However, DAMON sysfs interface and DAMON_RECLAIM are not
initializing it after calling damos_new_filter(). As a result,
accessing uninitialized memory is possible. Actually, adding multiple
DAMOS filters via DAMON sysfs interface caused NULL pointer
dereferencing. Initialize the field just after the allocation from
damos_new_filter().
Fixes: 98def236f63c ("mm/damon/core: implement damos filter")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.3.x-
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
mm/damon/core.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
index 91cff7f2997e..eb9580942a5c 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core.c
+++ b/mm/damon/core.c
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ struct damos_filter *damos_new_filter(enum damos_filter_type type,
return NULL;
filter->type = type;
filter->matching = matching;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&filter->list);
return filter;
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/core-test: add a test for damos_new_filter()
2023-07-29 20:37 [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix unitialized memory error from SeongJae Park
2023-07-29 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core: initialize damo_filter->list from damos_new_filter() SeongJae Park
@ 2023-07-29 20:37 ` SeongJae Park
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2023-07-29 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: SeongJae Park, Brendan Higgins, damon, linux-mm, linux-kselftest,
kunit-dev, stable, linux-kernel
damos_new_filter() was having a bug that not initializing ->list field
of the returning damos_filter struct, which results in access to
uninitialized memory. Add a unit test for the function.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.3.x-
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
mm/damon/core-test.h | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h
index bb07721909e1..4bddbfe243c3 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h
@@ -341,6 +341,18 @@ static void damon_test_set_attrs(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_set_attrs(c, &invalid_attrs), -EINVAL);
}
+static void damos_test_new_filter(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct damos_filter *filter;
+
+ filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON, true);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter->type, DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter->matching, true);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, filter->list.prev, &filter->list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, filter->list.next, &filter->list);
+ damos_destroy_filter(filter);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_target),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_regions),
@@ -353,6 +365,7 @@ static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_regions),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_monitoring_result),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_attrs),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_new_filter),
{},
};
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-29 20:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-29 20:37 [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix unitialized memory error from SeongJae Park
2023-07-29 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core: initialize damo_filter->list from damos_new_filter() SeongJae Park
2023-07-29 20:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/core-test: add a test for damos_new_filter() SeongJae Park
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).