From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: vmalloc: Set nr_nodes/node_size based on CPU-cores
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:11:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230829081142.3619-10-urezki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230829081142.3619-1-urezki@gmail.com>
The density ratio is set to 2, i.e. two users per one node.
For example if there are 6 cores in a system the "nr_nodes"
is 3.
The "node_size" also depends on number of physical cores.
A high-threshold limit is hard-coded and set to SZ_4M.
For 32-bit, single/dual core systems an access to a global
vmap heap is not balanced. Such small systems do not suffer
from lock contentions due to limitation of CPU-cores.
Test on AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core Processor:
sudo ./test_vmalloc.sh run_test_mask=127 nr_threads=64
<default perf>
94.17% 0.90% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock
93.27% 93.05% [kernel] [k] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
74.69% 0.25% [kernel] [k] __vmalloc_node_range
72.64% 0.01% [kernel] [k] __get_vm_area_node
72.04% 0.89% [kernel] [k] alloc_vmap_area
42.17% 0.00% [kernel] [k] vmalloc
32.53% 0.00% [kernel] [k] __vmalloc_node
24.91% 0.25% [kernel] [k] vfree
24.32% 0.01% [kernel] [k] remove_vm_area
22.63% 0.21% [kernel] [k] find_unlink_vmap_area
15.51% 0.00% [unknown] [k] 0xffffffffc09a74ac
14.35% 0.00% [kernel] [k] ret_from_fork_asm
14.35% 0.00% [kernel] [k] ret_from_fork
14.35% 0.00% [kernel] [k] kthread
<default perf>
vs
<patch-series perf>
74.32% 2.42% [kernel] [k] __vmalloc_node_range
69.58% 0.01% [kernel] [k] vmalloc
54.21% 1.17% [kernel] [k] __alloc_pages_bulk
48.13% 47.91% [kernel] [k] clear_page_orig
43.60% 0.01% [unknown] [k] 0xffffffffc082f16f
32.06% 0.00% [kernel] [k] ret_from_fork_asm
32.06% 0.00% [kernel] [k] ret_from_fork
32.06% 0.00% [kernel] [k] kthread
31.30% 0.00% [unknown] [k] 0xffffffffc082f889
22.98% 4.16% [kernel] [k] vfree
14.36% 0.28% [kernel] [k] __get_vm_area_node
13.43% 3.35% [kernel] [k] alloc_vmap_area
10.86% 0.04% [kernel] [k] remove_vm_area
8.89% 2.75% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock
7.19% 0.00% [unknown] [k] 0xffffffffc082fba3
6.65% 1.37% [kernel] [k] free_unref_page
6.13% 6.11% [kernel] [k] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
<patch-series perf>
confirms that a native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath bottle-neck
can be considered as negligible for the patch-series version.
The throughput is ~15x higher:
urezki@pc638:~$ time sudo ./test_vmalloc.sh run_test_mask=127 nr_threads=64
Run the test with following parameters: run_test_mask=127 nr_threads=64
Done.
Check the kernel ring buffer to see the summary.
real 24m3.305s
user 0m0.361s
sys 0m0.013s
urezki@pc638:~$
urezki@pc638:~$ time sudo ./test_vmalloc.sh run_test_mask=127 nr_threads=64
Run the test with following parameters: run_test_mask=127 nr_threads=64
Done.
Check the kernel ring buffer to see the summary.
real 1m28.382s
user 0m0.014s
sys 0m0.026s
urezki@pc638:~$
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 9cce012aecdb..08990f630c21 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -796,6 +796,9 @@ struct vmap_node {
atomic_t fill_in_progress;
};
+#define MAX_NODES U8_MAX
+#define MAX_NODE_SIZE SZ_4M
+
static struct vmap_node *nodes, snode;
static __read_mostly unsigned int nr_nodes = 1;
static __read_mostly unsigned int node_size = 1;
@@ -4803,11 +4806,24 @@ static void vmap_init_free_space(void)
}
}
+static unsigned int calculate_nr_nodes(void)
+{
+ unsigned int nr_cpus;
+
+ nr_cpus = num_present_cpus();
+ if (nr_cpus <= 1)
+ nr_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
+
+ /* Density factor. Two users per a node. */
+ return clamp_t(unsigned int, nr_cpus >> 1, 1, MAX_NODES);
+}
+
static void vmap_init_nodes(void)
{
struct vmap_node *vn;
int i;
+ nr_nodes = calculate_nr_nodes();
nodes = &snode;
if (nr_nodes > 1) {
@@ -4830,6 +4846,16 @@ static void vmap_init_nodes(void)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vn->free.head);
spin_lock_init(&vn->free.lock);
}
+
+ /*
+ * Scale a node size to number of CPUs. Each power of two
+ * value doubles a node size. A high-threshold limit is set
+ * to 4M.
+ */
+#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+ if (nr_nodes > 1)
+ node_size = min(SZ_64K << fls(num_possible_cpus()), SZ_4M);
+#endif
}
void __init vmalloc_init(void)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-29 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-29 8:11 [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: vmalloc: Add va_alloc() helper Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:51 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 15:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm: vmalloc: Rename adjust_va_to_fit_type() function Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:51 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:27 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm: vmalloc: Move vmap_init_free_space() down in vmalloc.c Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:52 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:29 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29 14:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-30 14:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 2:17 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:40 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 9:39 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 9:58 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 1:51 ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08 4:43 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 5:01 ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08 6:44 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 11:25 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-08 11:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 13:23 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11 2:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 16:53 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:19 ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global purge_vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11 2:57 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:00 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 6:04 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 19:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 0:06 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:33 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11 3:25 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:10 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:21 ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vread_iter Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11 3:58 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 18:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:42 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:42 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-14 3:02 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14 3:36 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14 3:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 10:59 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:38 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vmallocinfo Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:02 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) [this message]
2023-09-15 13:03 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: vmalloc: Set nr_nodes/node_size based on CPU-cores Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:31 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-31 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Baoquan He
2023-08-31 16:26 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 14:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2023-09-05 6:53 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-06 20:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-09-07 9:15 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230829081142.3619-10-urezki@gmail.com \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).