From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev
To: vbabka@suse.cz, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 4/9] slub: Prepare __slab_free() for unfrozen partial slab out of node partial list
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:07:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231031140741.79387-5-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231031140741.79387-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Now the partially empty slub will be frozen when taken out of node partial
list, so the __slab_free() will know from "was_frozen" that the partially
empty slab is not on node partial list and is a cpu or cpu partial slab
of some cpu.
But we will change this, make partial slabs leave the node partial list
with unfrozen state, so we need to change __slab_free() to use the new
slab_test_node_partial() we just introduced.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index eed8ae0dbaf9..1880b483350e 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3631,6 +3631,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
unsigned long counters;
struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
+ bool on_node_partial;
stat(s, FREE_SLOWPATH);
@@ -3678,6 +3679,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
+ on_node_partial = slab_test_node_partial(slab);
}
}
@@ -3706,6 +3708,15 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
return;
}
+ /*
+ * This slab was partially empty but not on the per-node partial list,
+ * in which case we shouldn't manipulate its list, just return.
+ */
+ if (prior && !on_node_partial) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (unlikely(!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial))
goto slab_empty;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-31 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-31 14:07 [RFC PATCH v4 0/9] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/9] slub: Reflow ___slab_alloc() chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/9] slub: Change get_partial() interfaces to return slab chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/9] slub: Keep track of whether slub is on the per-node partial list chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 12:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-31 14:07 ` chengming.zhou [this message]
2023-11-01 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/9] slub: Prepare __slab_free() for unfrozen partial slab out of node " Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/9] slub: Introduce freeze_slab() chengming.zhou
2023-12-03 6:08 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/9] slub: Delay freezing of partial slabs chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/9] slub: Optimize deactivate_slab() chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 13:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-02 2:10 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/9] slub: Rename all *unfreeze_partials* functions to *put_partials* chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 13:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-02 2:12 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 9/9] slub: Update frozen slabs documentations in the source chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 13:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-02 2:48 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-11-01 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/9] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-11-02 2:17 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-11-01 13:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-02 2:19 ` Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231031140741.79387-5-chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).