From: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com, Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/7] hugetlb: pass *next_nid_to_alloc directly to for_each_node_mask_to_alloc
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 21:12:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240102131249.76622-5-gang.li@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240102131249.76622-1-gang.li@linux.dev>
The parallelization of hugetlb allocation leads to errors when sharing
h->next_nid_to_alloc across different threads. To address this, it's
necessary to assign a separate next_nid_to_alloc for each thread.
Consequently, the hstate_next_node_to_alloc and for_each_node_mask_to_alloc
have been modified to directly accept a *next_nid_to_alloc parameter,
ensuring thread-specific allocation and avoiding concurrent access issues.
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>
---
This patch seems not elegant, but I can't come up with anything better.
Any suggestions will be highly appreciated!
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 92448e747991d..a71bc1622b53b 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1464,15 +1464,15 @@ static int get_valid_node_allowed(int nid, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
* next node from which to allocate, handling wrap at end of node
* mask.
*/
-static int hstate_next_node_to_alloc(struct hstate *h,
+static int hstate_next_node_to_alloc(int *next_nid_to_alloc,
nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
{
int nid;
VM_BUG_ON(!nodes_allowed);
- nid = get_valid_node_allowed(h->next_nid_to_alloc, nodes_allowed);
- h->next_nid_to_alloc = next_node_allowed(nid, nodes_allowed);
+ nid = get_valid_node_allowed(*next_nid_to_alloc, nodes_allowed);
+ *next_nid_to_alloc = next_node_allowed(nid, nodes_allowed);
return nid;
}
@@ -1495,10 +1495,10 @@ static int hstate_next_node_to_free(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
return nid;
}
-#define for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(hs, nr_nodes, node, mask) \
+#define for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(next_nid_to_alloc, nr_nodes, node, mask) \
for (nr_nodes = nodes_weight(*mask); \
nr_nodes > 0 && \
- ((node = hstate_next_node_to_alloc(hs, mask)) || 1); \
+ ((node = hstate_next_node_to_alloc(next_nid_to_alloc, mask)) || 1); \
nr_nodes--)
#define for_each_node_mask_to_free(hs, nr_nodes, node, mask) \
@@ -2350,12 +2350,13 @@ static void prep_and_add_allocated_folios(struct hstate *h,
*/
static struct folio *alloc_pool_huge_folio(struct hstate *h,
nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
- nodemask_t *node_alloc_noretry)
+ nodemask_t *node_alloc_noretry,
+ int *next_nid_to_alloc)
{
gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE;
int nr_nodes, node;
- for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
+ for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(next_nid_to_alloc, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
struct folio *folio;
folio = only_alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio(h, gfp_mask, node,
@@ -3310,7 +3311,7 @@ int __alloc_bootmem_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
goto found;
}
/* allocate from next node when distributing huge pages */
- for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, &node_states[N_MEMORY]) {
+ for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(&h->next_nid_to_alloc, nr_nodes, node, &node_states[N_MEMORY]) {
m = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(
huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h),
0, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
@@ -3684,7 +3685,7 @@ static int adjust_pool_surplus(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
VM_BUG_ON(delta != -1 && delta != 1);
if (delta < 0) {
- for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
+ for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(&h->next_nid_to_alloc, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
if (h->surplus_huge_pages_node[node])
goto found;
}
@@ -3799,7 +3800,8 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
cond_resched();
folio = alloc_pool_huge_folio(h, nodes_allowed,
- node_alloc_noretry);
+ node_alloc_noretry,
+ &h->next_nid_to_alloc);
if (!folio) {
prep_and_add_allocated_folios(h, &page_list);
spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-02 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 13:12 [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] hugetlb: code clean for hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2024-01-10 10:19 ` Muchun Song
2024-01-11 3:30 ` Gang Li
2024-01-10 21:55 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-11 3:34 ` Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] hugetlb: split hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2024-01-10 23:12 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-11 3:44 ` Gang Li
2024-01-16 7:02 ` Muchun Song
2024-01-16 8:09 ` Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] padata: dispatch works on different nodes Gang Li
2024-01-11 17:50 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-12 7:09 ` Gang Li
2024-01-12 18:27 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-15 8:57 ` Gang Li
2024-01-17 22:14 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-18 6:15 ` Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` Gang Li [this message]
2024-01-03 1:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] hugetlb: pass *next_nid_to_alloc directly to for_each_node_mask_to_alloc David Rientjes
2024-01-03 2:22 ` Gang Li
2024-01-03 2:36 ` David Rientjes
2024-01-11 22:21 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-12 8:07 ` Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] hugetlb: have CONFIG_HUGETLBFS select CONFIG_PADATA Gang Li
2024-01-11 22:49 ` Tim Chen
2024-01-16 9:26 ` Muchun Song
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] hugetlb: parallelize 2M hugetlb allocation and initialization Gang Li
2024-01-02 13:12 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] hugetlb: parallelize 1G hugetlb initialization Gang Li
2024-01-03 1:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot David Rientjes
2024-01-03 2:20 ` Gang Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240102131249.76622-5-gang.li@linux.dev \
--to=gang.li@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).