From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
Chris Li <chriscli@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/zswap: optimize the scalability of zswap rb-tree
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 11:22:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240117-b4-zswap-lock-optimize-v2-0-b5cc55479090@bytedance.com> (raw)
Changes in v2:
- Change swap_zswap_tree() to static inline function.
- Collect Acked-by tags.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240117-b4-zswap-lock-optimize-v1-0-23f6effe5775@bytedance.com
When testing the zswap performance by using kernel build -j32 in a tmpfs
directory, I found the scalability of zswap rb-tree is not good, which
is protected by the only spinlock. That would cause heavy lock contention
if multiple tasks zswap_store/load concurrently.
So a simple solution is to split the only one zswap rb-tree into multiple
rb-trees, each corresponds to SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES (64M). This idea is
from the commit 4b3ef9daa4fc ("mm/swap: split swap cache into 64MB trunks").
Although this method can't solve the spinlock contention completely, it
can mitigate much of that contention. Below is the results of kernel build
in tmpfs with zswap shrinker enabled:
linux-next zswap-lock-optimize
real 1m9.181s 1m3.820s
user 17m44.036s 17m40.100s
sys 7m37.297s 4m54.622s
So there are clearly improvements. And it's complementary with the ongoing
zswap xarray conversion by Chris. Anyway, I think we can also merge this
first, it's complementary IMHO. So I just refresh and resend this for
further discussion.
Thanks for review and comment!
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
Chengming Zhou (2):
mm/zswap: make sure each swapfile always have zswap rb-tree
mm/zswap: split zswap rb-tree
include/linux/zswap.h | 7 +++--
mm/swapfile.c | 10 +++++--
mm/zswap.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ab27740f76654ed58dd32ac0ba0031c18a6dea3b
change-id: 20240117-b4-zswap-lock-optimize-44e071c13427
Best regards,
--
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 11:22 Chengming Zhou [this message]
2024-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/zswap: make sure each swapfile always have zswap rb-tree Chengming Zhou
2024-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/zswap: split " Chengming Zhou
2024-01-22 19:49 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-01-23 7:46 ` Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240117-b4-zswap-lock-optimize-v2-0-b5cc55479090@bytedance.com \
--to=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chriscli@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).