From: debug@rivosinc.com
To: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org,
Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com,
keescook@chromium.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com,
atishp@atishpatra.org, alex@ghiti.fr, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, oleg@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com,
shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, debug@rivosinc.com,
guoren@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, evan@rivosinc.com,
xiao.w.wang@intel.com, apatel@ventanamicro.com,
mchitale@ventanamicro.com, waylingii@gmail.com,
greentime.hu@sifive.com, heiko@sntech.de, jszhang@kernel.org,
shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, david@redhat.com,
charlie@rivosinc.com, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn,
willy@infradead.org, vincent.chen@sifive.com,
andy.chiu@sifive.com, gerg@kernel.org,
jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com, mason.huo@starfivetech.com,
ancientmodern4@gmail.com, mathis.salmen@matsal.de,
cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, bhe@redhat.com, chenjiahao16@huawei.com,
ruscur@russell.cc, bgray@linux.ibm.com, alx@kernel.org,
baruch@tkos.co.il, zhangqing@loongson.cn,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, revest@chromium.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, shr@devkernel.io,
omosnace@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 23/28] riscv signal: Save and restore of shadow stack for signal
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:21:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125062739.1339782-24-debug@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com>
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Save shadow stack pointer in sigcontext structure while delivering signal.
Restore shadow stack pointer from sigcontext on sigreturn.
Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 18 ++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
index 4bd10dcd48aa..28c67866ff6f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task);
bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task);
bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task);
bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task);
+unsigned long get_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task);
+int restore_user_shstk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long shstk_ptr);
+int save_user_shstk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *saved_shstk_ptr);
#define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE)
@@ -70,6 +73,16 @@ static inline bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task)
return false;
}
+int restore_user_shstk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long shstk_ptr)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+int save_user_shstk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *saved_shstk_ptr)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
static inline bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task)
{
return false;
@@ -81,6 +94,11 @@ static inline bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task)
return false;
}
+static inline unsigned long get_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c
index 88b6220b2608..d1092f0a6363 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <asm/vector.h>
#include <asm/csr.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+#include <asm/usercfi.h>
unsigned long signal_minsigstksz __ro_after_init;
@@ -229,6 +230,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn)
struct pt_regs *regs = current_pt_regs();
struct rt_sigframe __user *frame;
struct task_struct *task;
+ unsigned long ss_ptr = 0;
sigset_t set;
size_t frame_size = get_rt_frame_size(false);
@@ -251,6 +253,26 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn)
if (restore_altstack(&frame->uc.uc_stack))
goto badframe;
+ /*
+ * Restore shadow stack as a form of token stored on shadow stack itself as a safe
+ * way to restore.
+ * A token on shadow gives following properties
+ * - Safe save and restore for shadow stack switching. Any save of shadow stack
+ * must have had saved a token on shadow stack. Similarly any restore of shadow
+ * stack must check the token before restore. Since writing to shadow stack with
+ * address of shadow stack itself is not easily allowed. A restore without a save
+ * is quite difficult for an attacker to perform.
+ * - A natural break. A token in shadow stack provides a natural break in shadow stack
+ * So a single linear range can be bucketed into different shadow stack segments.
+ * sspopchk will detect the condition and fault to kernel as sw check exception.
+ */
+ if (__copy_from_user(&ss_ptr, &frame->uc.uc_mcontext.sc_cfi_state.ss_ptr,
+ sizeof(unsigned long)))
+ goto badframe;
+
+ if (is_shstk_enabled(current) && restore_user_shstk(current, ss_ptr))
+ goto badframe;
+
regs->cause = -1UL;
return regs->a0;
@@ -320,6 +342,7 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
struct rt_sigframe __user *frame;
long err = 0;
unsigned long __maybe_unused addr;
+ unsigned long ss_ptr = 0;
size_t frame_size = get_rt_frame_size(false);
frame = get_sigframe(ksig, regs, frame_size);
@@ -331,6 +354,23 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
/* Create the ucontext. */
err |= __put_user(0, &frame->uc.uc_flags);
err |= __put_user(NULL, &frame->uc.uc_link);
+ /*
+ * Save a pointer to shadow stack itself on shadow stack as a form of token.
+ * A token on shadow gives following properties
+ * - Safe save and restore for shadow stack switching. Any save of shadow stack
+ * must have had saved a token on shadow stack. Similarly any restore of shadow
+ * stack must check the token before restore. Since writing to shadow stack with
+ * address of shadow stack itself is not easily allowed. A restore without a save
+ * is quite difficult for an attacker to perform.
+ * - A natural break. A token in shadow stack provides a natural break in shadow stack
+ * So a single linear range can be bucketed into different shadow stack segments. Any
+ * sspopchk will detect the condition and fault to kernel as sw check exception.
+ */
+ if (is_shstk_enabled(current)) {
+ err |= save_user_shstk(current, &ss_ptr);
+ err |= __put_user(ss_ptr, &frame->uc.uc_mcontext.sc_cfi_state.ss_ptr);
+ }
+
err |= __save_altstack(&frame->uc.uc_stack, regs->sp);
err |= setup_sigcontext(frame, regs);
err |= __copy_to_user(&frame->uc.uc_sigmask, set, sizeof(*set));
@@ -341,6 +381,11 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
regs->ra = (unsigned long)VDSO_SYMBOL(
current->mm->context.vdso, rt_sigreturn);
+
+ /* if bcfi is enabled x1 (ra) and x5 (t0) must match. not sure if we need this? */
+ if (is_shstk_enabled(current))
+ regs->t0 = regs->ra;
+
#else
/*
* For the nommu case we don't have a VDSO. Instead we push two
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
index af8cc8f4616c..f5eb0124571b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
@@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr)
task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk = shstk_addr;
}
+unsigned long get_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk;
+}
+
void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable)
{
task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en = enable ? 1 : 0;
@@ -165,6 +170,48 @@ static int create_rstor_token(unsigned long ssp, unsigned long *token_addr)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Save user shadow stack pointer on shadow stack itself and return pointer to saved location
+ * returns -EFAULT if operation was unsuccessful
+ */
+int save_user_shstk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *saved_shstk_ptr)
+{
+ unsigned long ss_ptr = 0;
+ unsigned long token_loc = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (saved_shstk_ptr == NULL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ss_ptr = get_active_shstk(tsk);
+ ret = create_rstor_token(ss_ptr, &token_loc);
+
+ *saved_shstk_ptr = token_loc;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Restores user shadow stack pointer from token on shadow stack for task `tsk`
+ * returns -EFAULT if operation was unsuccessful
+ */
+int restore_user_shstk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long shstk_ptr)
+{
+ unsigned long token = 0;
+
+ token = amo_user_shstk((unsigned long __user *)shstk_ptr, 0);
+
+ if (token == -1)
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ /* invalid token, return EINVAL */
+ if ((token - shstk_ptr) != SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* all checks passed, set active shstk and return success */
+ set_active_shstk(tsk, token);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static unsigned long allocate_shadow_stack(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
unsigned long token_offset,
bool set_tok)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 6:21 [RFC PATCH v1 00/28] riscv control-flow integrity for usermode debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/28] riscv: abstract envcfg CSR debug
2024-02-12 10:23 ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/28] riscv: envcfg save and restore on trap entry/exit debug
2024-01-25 7:19 ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-25 17:09 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 17:54 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/28] riscv: define default value for envcfg debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/28] riscv/Kconfig: enable HAVE_EXIT_THREAD for riscv debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/28] riscv: zicfiss/zicfilp enumeration debug
2024-01-25 17:59 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 18:26 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 18:46 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/28] riscv: zicfiss/zicfilp extension csr and bit definitions debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/28] riscv: kernel handling on trap entry/exit for user cfi debug
2024-01-25 7:29 ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-25 17:30 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 19:47 ` Stefan O'Rear
2024-01-26 0:25 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/28] mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for RISC-V debug
2024-01-25 8:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-01-25 17:05 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/28] mm: abstract shadow stack vma behind `arch_is_shadow_stack` debug
2024-01-25 8:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-01-25 17:07 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-13 10:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-22 1:32 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/28] riscv/mm : Introducing new protection flag "PROT_SHADOWSTACK" debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/28] riscv: Implementing "PROT_SHADOWSTACK" on riscv debug
[not found] ` <2914cf78e47010e195d963857b37807e8446e3be.camel@intel.com>
2024-02-22 0:39 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/28] riscv mm: manufacture shadow stack pte debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/28] riscv mmu: teach pte_mkwrite to manufacture shadow stack PTEs debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/28] riscv mmu: write protect and shadow stack debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/28] riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall debug
2024-01-25 21:24 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-01-26 0:44 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-06 16:01 ` Mark Brown
2024-02-22 0:47 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-02-22 13:33 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <ba45e69f69851721419b84f1ff8b66a490f92c86.camel@intel.com>
2024-02-22 0:50 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/28] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/28] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/28] prctl: arch-agnostic prtcl for indirect branch tracking debug
2024-02-06 16:13 ` Mark Brown
2024-02-22 0:42 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/28] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/28] riscv: Implements arch argnostic indirect branch tracking prctls debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/28] riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/28] riscv sigcontext: adding cfi state field in sigcontext debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` debug [this message]
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/28] riscv: select config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support debug
2024-01-25 18:04 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 18:12 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 18:44 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25 19:26 ` Deepak Gupta
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/28] riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 26/28] riscv: Documentation for landing pad / indirect branch tracking debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 27/28] riscv: Documentation for shadow stack on riscv debug
2024-01-25 6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 28/28] kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi debug
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240125062739.1339782-24-debug@rivosinc.com \
--to=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=ancientmodern4@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.chiu@sifive.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=bgray@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cuiyunhui@bytedance.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=gerg@kernel.org \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mason.huo@starfivetech.com \
--cc=mathis.salmen@matsal.de \
--cc=mchitale@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=shr@devkernel.io \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.chen@sifive.com \
--cc=waylingii@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhangqing@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).