From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Jon Grimm <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>,
Brian Morris <bsmorris@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Memory tiering kernel alignment
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:16:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240126001618.13281-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e351526b-0872-afcb-4eb7-a3dd6242f9f9@google.com>
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:37:02 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:04:37PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:26:19AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
[...]
> This is **exactly** the type of discussion we're looking to have :)
>
> There are some things that I've chatted informally with folks about that
> I'd like to bring to the forum:
>
> - Decoupling CPU migration from memory migration for NUMA Balancing (or
> perhaps deprecating CPU migration entirely)
>
> - Allowing NUMA Balancing to do migration as part of a kthread
> asynchronous to the NUMA hint fault, in kernel context
>
> - Abstraction for future hardware devices that can provide an expanded
> view into page hotness that can be leveraged in different areas of the
> kernel, including as a backend for NUMA Balanacing to replace NUMA
> hint faults
>
> - Per-container support for configuring balancing and memory migration
>
> - Opting certain types of memory into NUMA Balancing (like tmpfs) while
> leaving other types alone
>
> - Utilizing hardware accelerated memory migration as a replacement for
> the traditional migrate_pages() path when available
>
> I could go code all of this up and spend an enormous amount of time doing
> so only to get NAKed by somebody because I'm ripping out their critical
> use case that I just didn't know about :) There's also the question of
> whether DAMON should be the source of truth for this or it should be
> decoupled.
I wouldn't dare to say DAMON should be the source of truth, but I hope DAMON to
be somewhat useful. DAMON is designed to be able to be easily extended[1] for
various access monitoring / memory management primitives including hardware
features. DAMOS of today provides a feature called filter[2], which allows
applying specific operations to specific pages depending on their
non-access-pattern information including type (anon vs file-backed) and which
memcg it belongs to. Hence I think DAMON might be able to be used for a few of
above cases.
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/mm/damon/design.html#configurable-operations-set
[2] https://docs.kernel.org/mm/damon/design.html#filters
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 18:26 [RFC] Memory tiering kernel alignment David Rientjes
2024-01-25 18:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-25 20:04 ` David Rientjes
2024-01-25 20:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-25 21:37 ` David Rientjes
2024-01-25 22:28 ` Gregory Price
2024-01-26 0:16 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2024-01-26 21:06 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-26 23:03 ` Gregory Price
2024-01-28 20:15 ` David Rientjes
2024-01-29 10:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-01-26 20:41 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-26 0:04 ` SeongJae Park
[not found] ` <tsnp3a6oxglx2siv7aoplo665k7xsigkqtpfm5yiu2r3wvys26@3vntgau4t2gv>
2024-01-26 14:31 ` John Groves
2024-02-29 2:04 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2024-02-29 4:01 ` Bharata B Rao
2024-02-29 18:23 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240126001618.13281-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=bsmorris@google.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).