linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: [linux-next:master 12265/12944] arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:904:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_leaf'; did you mean 'pmd_leaf'?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:10:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head:   8ffc8b1bbd505e27e2c8439d326b6059c906c9dd
commit: 924bd6a8c96767a05323d575bdefd664631dce73 [12265/12944] mm/x86: drop two unnecessary pud_leaf() definitions
config: arm64-randconfig-r031-20230409 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240310/202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240310/202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6,
                    from arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:12,
                    from include/linux/io.h:13,
                    from include/acpi/acpi_io.h:5,
                    from include/linux/acpi.h:39,
                    from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
                    from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
                    from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
                    from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'pud_user_accessible_page':
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:904:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_leaf'; did you mean 'pmd_leaf'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     904 |         return pud_leaf(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
         |                ^~~~~~~~
         |                pmd_leaf
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
   make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:116: arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
   make[3]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[2]: *** [Makefile:1199: prepare0] Error 2
   make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.


vim +904 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h

ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  901  
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  902  static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  903  {
730a11f982e61a Liu Shixin   2022-11-22 @904  	return pud_leaf(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  905  }
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  906  #endif
ed928a3402d8a2 Tong Tiangen 2022-05-17  907  

:::::: The code at line 904 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 730a11f982e61aaef758ab552dfb7c30de79e99b arm64/mm: add pud_user_exec() check in pud_user_accessible_page()

:::::: TO: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
:::::: CC: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-10  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-10  8:10 kernel test robot [this message]
2024-03-11 16:19 ` [linux-next:master 12265/12944] arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:904:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_leaf'; did you mean 'pmd_leaf'? Peter Xu
2024-03-13 19:06   ` Andrew Morton
2024-03-13 19:59     ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202403101607.a42gaLOS-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).