From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>,
yue sun <samsun1006219@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/memfd_secret: add vmsplice() test
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:41:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325134114.257544-3-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325134114.257544-1-david@redhat.com>
Let's add a simple reproducer for a scneario where GUP-fast could succeed
on secretmem folios, making vmsplice() succeed instead of failing. The
reproducer is based on a reproducer [1] by Miklos Szeredi.
Perform the ftruncate() only once, and check the return value.
For some reason, vmsplice() reliably fails (making the test succeed) when
we move the test_vmsplice() call after test_process_vm_read() /
test_ptrace(). Properly cleaning up in test_remote_access(), which is not
part of this change, won't change that behavior. Therefore, run the
vmsplice() test for now first -- something is a bit off once we involve
fork().
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJfpegt3UCsMmxd0taOY11Uaw5U=eS1fE5dn0wZX3HF0oy8-oQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
index 9b298f6a04b3..0acbdcf8230e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
#include "../kselftest.h"
@@ -83,6 +84,43 @@ static void test_mlock_limit(int fd)
pass("mlock limit is respected\n");
}
+static void test_vmsplice(int fd)
+{
+ ssize_t transferred;
+ struct iovec iov;
+ int pipefd[2];
+ char *mem;
+
+ if (pipe(pipefd)) {
+ fail("pipe failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ mem = mmap(NULL, page_size, prot, mode, fd, 0);
+ if (mem == MAP_FAILED) {
+ fail("Unable to mmap secret memory\n");
+ goto close_pipe;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * vmsplice() may use GUP-fast, which must also fail. Prefault the
+ * page table, so GUP-fast could find it.
+ */
+ memset(mem, PATTERN, page_size);
+
+ iov.iov_base = mem;
+ iov.iov_len = page_size;
+ transferred = vmsplice(pipefd[1], &iov, 1, 0);
+
+ ksft_test_result(transferred < 0 && errno == EFAULT,
+ "vmsplice is blocked as expected\n");
+
+ munmap(mem, page_size);
+close_pipe:
+ close(pipefd[0]);
+ close(pipefd[1]);
+}
+
static void try_process_vm_read(int fd, int pipefd[2])
{
struct iovec liov, riov;
@@ -187,7 +225,6 @@ static void test_remote_access(int fd, const char *name,
return;
}
- ftruncate(fd, page_size);
memset(mem, PATTERN, page_size);
if (write(pipefd[1], &mem, sizeof(mem)) < 0) {
@@ -258,7 +295,7 @@ static void prepare(void)
strerror(errno));
}
-#define NUM_TESTS 4
+#define NUM_TESTS 5
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
@@ -277,9 +314,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
ksft_exit_fail_msg("memfd_secret failed: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
}
+ if (ftruncate(fd, page_size))
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("ftruncate failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
test_mlock_limit(fd);
test_file_apis(fd);
+ test_vmsplice(fd);
test_process_vm_read(fd);
test_ptrace(fd);
--
2.43.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 13:41 [PATCH v1 0/3] mm/secretmem: one fix and one refactoring David Hildenbrand
2024-03-25 13:41 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] mm/secretmem: fix GUP-fast succeeding on secretmem folios David Hildenbrand
2024-03-25 18:30 ` Andrew Morton
2024-03-26 13:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-25 13:41 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-03-26 6:17 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/memfd_secret: add vmsplice() test Mike Rapoport
2024-03-26 12:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 13:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-25 13:41 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mm: merge folio_is_secretmem() into folio_fast_pin_allowed() David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 6:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-26 8:40 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240325134114.257544-3-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=samsun1006219@gmail.com \
--cc=xrivendell7@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).