From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: willy@infradead.org, sj@kernel.org,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, maskray@google.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com,
21cnbao@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com,
zokeefe@google.com, shy828301@gmail.com, xiehuan09@gmail.com,
libang.li@antgroup.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
songmuchun@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v5 2/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:47:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240513074712.7608-3-ioworker0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240513074712.7608-1-ioworker0@gmail.com>
In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address()
to split the folio.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/huge_mm.h | 6 ++++++
mm/huge_memory.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
mm/rmap.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index c8d3ec116e29..9fcb0b0b6ed1 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -409,6 +409,9 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
}
+void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
+ pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
+
#else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
@@ -471,6 +474,9 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
+static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
+ bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
#define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
do { } while (0)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 317de2afd371..425272c6c50b 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2581,6 +2581,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
}
+void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
+ pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
+ VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
+
+ /*
+ * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
+ * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
+ * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
+ */
+ if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
+ is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
+ if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
+ return;
+ __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
+ }
+}
+
void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
{
@@ -2592,26 +2613,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
(address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
-
- /*
- * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
- * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
- */
- VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
-
- if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
- is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
- /*
- * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
- * guaranteed that pmd is present.
- */
- if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
- goto out;
- __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
- }
-
-out:
+ split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
spin_unlock(ptl);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
}
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index ddffa30c79fb..4c4d14325f2e 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1640,9 +1640,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
- if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
- split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
-
/*
* For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
* For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
@@ -1668,9 +1665,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
- /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
-
/*
* If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
*/
@@ -1682,6 +1676,23 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
goto walk_done_err;
}
+ if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
+ /*
+ * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
+ * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
+ */
+ split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pvmw.pmd, false,
+ folio);
+ pvmw.pmd = NULL;
+ spin_unlock(pvmw.ptl);
+ pvmw.ptl = NULL;
+ flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
+ VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
+
pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(pvmw.pte));
subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
address = pvmw.address;
--
2.33.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-13 7:47 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
2024-05-13 7:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 1/4] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop Lance Yang
2024-05-14 6:26 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-14 7:43 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-13 7:47 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2024-05-13 7:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 3/4] mm/mlock: check for THP missing the mlock in try_to_unmap_one() Lance Yang
2024-05-14 6:41 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-14 7:46 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-13 7:47 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 4/4] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
2024-05-14 7:09 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-14 8:36 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240513074712.7608-3-ioworker0@gmail.com \
--to=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiehuan09@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).