From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFF9C25B75 for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 19:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5A72E6B0390; Wed, 15 May 2024 15:00:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5581D6B0393; Wed, 15 May 2024 15:00:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3F7E86B0394; Wed, 15 May 2024 15:00:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215BC6B0390 for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 15:00:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8911615D4 for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 19:00:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82121546136.16.6766C31 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF11340021 for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 19:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf27.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=OsWUDXCz; spf=pass (imf27.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1715799626; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=GjRy1EWvkAXHAVFF2JYdoo6Ci8Vea+I1sxx0s0sRawo=; b=rNu7E3NBVTWHTuIacbzue77ysAAJuAxBTYpyOusZ9hygakp0qF3j8mIJkAOZ7wvRE0oW9N em04eeJaVAGmv7oZi9VcjP6QQCuDsg2v3iDS6sQ/huSI0CgvHE4t3Tw/HjrlABRX3Jk2Iy thNoyqjHNVa8NXX/sRp3gdEcDioQ1ek= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf27.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=OsWUDXCz; spf=pass (imf27.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1715799626; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Zhi2IkoBrdM9xl6thSsCUXZJfrzv+ZmvdBxNeUtytXebsZz4O2s42IrSNldrRj4mElbK8Z L3ZaQIDxuLT9pLGOw5UuNZN8rL5OmXKixIkQ+URbN4/nSLsZT1ohKD4fiZJ4+jrPx/ONmy OjImz9Btu/bsb9DtFB1MSMjyVI+77uU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715799626; x=1747335626; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+mIeh5KI0izxMe84lBORgKKfXA8qSWqkYZkXvTYhors=; b=OsWUDXCzALHFbGepD5bt7jUTG5hHg5nA/tH86pKLmjppM1CUtbbVZFba DW0CRn+posznPhkLn5uZkKX8yz97tWL3225xU2O6lHxGswR5DkAzUcJ7s ARDp2WLLLqrM7e9gzRWhars/LgPNfhDaiK4fcYaSBGBQ5s8U36DPGzmUn NwgDKuYKuBwRLBgd8MGZB3olJvvUuwarx7RFiMaEJvSf5eF1PI+9w765J bsdY7SU8fLieOsDHv+um2CxW0+V+4gt7EBuwe2jmP5IVEG7ZiN4WK0/tc EOxWV0jefC4SHSjCllHSSkbc6Hk+AICXeo9UsndkXDoIQ3BV53MNWcjpz g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: scThyJ48QDaqWgEPxkzeSQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OiPboi7CR5KNbLGbcsXfIg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11074"; a="22474829" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,162,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="22474829" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 May 2024 12:00:05 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: E6I9vhs0R+KZZ4J3ei3aPQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: rMGQoZqjQom4Ll0DOp/J6Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,162,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="36035653" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f8b243fe6e68) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2024 12:00:01 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f8b243fe6e68 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s7Jr4-000DB2-0s; Wed, 15 May 2024 18:59:58 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 02:59:35 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Daniel Gomez , "hughd@google.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "willy@infradead.org" , "jack@suse.cz" , "mcgrof@kernel.org" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "djwong@kernel.org" , Pankaj Raghav , "dagmcr@gmail.com" , "yosryahmed@google.com" , "baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com" , "ritesh.list@gmail.com" , "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "david@redhat.com" , "chandan.babu@oracle.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "brauner@kernel.org" , Daniel Gomez Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] shmem: add large folio support to the write and fallocate paths Message-ID: <202405160245.2EBqOCyg-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240515055719.32577-13-da.gomez@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240515055719.32577-13-da.gomez@samsung.com> X-Stat-Signature: stumxxjtgmxahpnwtfh814sbaji9s6ct X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CF11340021 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-HE-Tag: 1715799625-468912 X-HE-Meta: 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 O+Yc8f0x 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Daniel, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test WARNING on xfs-linux/for-next brauner-vfs/vfs.all linus/master v6.9 next-20240515] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Daniel-Gomez/splice-don-t-check-for-uptodate-if-partially-uptodate-is-impl/20240515-135925 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240515055719.32577-13-da.gomez%40samsung.com patch subject: [PATCH 12/12] shmem: add large folio support to the write and fallocate paths config: openrisc-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240516/202405160245.2EBqOCyg-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240516/202405160245.2EBqOCyg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405160245.2EBqOCyg-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/shmem.c:1864: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'sbinfo' not described in 'shmem_mapping_size_order' mm/shmem.c:2427: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'len' not described in 'shmem_get_folio' vim +1864 mm/shmem.c 1845 1846 /** 1847 * shmem_mapping_size_order - Get maximum folio order for the given file size. 1848 * @mapping: Target address_space. 1849 * @index: The page index. 1850 * @size: The suggested size of the folio to create. 1851 * 1852 * This returns a high order for folios (when supported) based on the file size 1853 * which the mapping currently allows at the given index. The index is relevant 1854 * due to alignment considerations the mapping might have. The returned order 1855 * may be less than the size passed. 1856 * 1857 * Like __filemap_get_folio order calculation. 1858 * 1859 * Return: The order. 1860 */ 1861 static inline unsigned int 1862 shmem_mapping_size_order(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index, 1863 size_t size, struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo) > 1864 { 1865 unsigned int order = ilog2(size); 1866 1867 if ((order <= PAGE_SHIFT) || 1868 (!mapping_large_folio_support(mapping) || !sbinfo->noswap)) 1869 return 0; 1870 1871 order -= PAGE_SHIFT; 1872 1873 /* If we're not aligned, allocate a smaller folio */ 1874 if (index & ((1UL << order) - 1)) 1875 order = __ffs(index); 1876 1877 order = min_t(size_t, order, MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER); 1878 1879 /* Order-1 not supported due to THP dependency */ 1880 return (order == 1) ? 0 : order; 1881 } 1882 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki